<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Apple Watch 3 or Garmin Vivoactive 3: which to get?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gadgetsandwearables.com/2017/10/21/apple-watch-3-or-garmin-vivoactive-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gadgetsandwearables.com/2017/10/21/apple-watch-3-or-garmin-vivoactive-3/</link>
	<description>News, reviews, comparisons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill		</title>
		<link>https://gadgetsandwearables.com/2017/10/21/apple-watch-3-or-garmin-vivoactive-3/#comment-16139</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetsandwearables.com/?p=25226#comment-16139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Umm...what? This is the first time I&#039;ve ever seen *anybody* say the Garmin isn&#039;t *worlds* better than the Apple Watch in terms of design.

The Garmin looks (I would estimate) maybe 65,000x better. The fact that you can actually check the time on it much more quickly is a nice bonus too.

There&#039;s plenty to like about the Apple Watch (personally I wouldn&#039;t a buy a watch I couldn&#039;t play music on), but the godawful design (which looks like literally every cheap smartwatch out there) is a big hurdle.

The fact that the Apple Watch doesn&#039;t work with Android is also a bummer. I like to switch phones a lot, meaning the Apple Watch is a risky option. There&#039;s no support for people with Android phones (or even fairly old iPhones).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;what? This is the first time I&#8217;ve ever seen *anybody* say the Garmin isn&#8217;t *worlds* better than the Apple Watch in terms of design.</p>
<p>The Garmin looks (I would estimate) maybe 65,000x better. The fact that you can actually check the time on it much more quickly is a nice bonus too.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty to like about the Apple Watch (personally I wouldn&#8217;t a buy a watch I couldn&#8217;t play music on), but the godawful design (which looks like literally every cheap smartwatch out there) is a big hurdle.</p>
<p>The fact that the Apple Watch doesn&#8217;t work with Android is also a bummer. I like to switch phones a lot, meaning the Apple Watch is a risky option. There&#8217;s no support for people with Android phones (or even fairly old iPhones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenny		</title>
		<link>https://gadgetsandwearables.com/2017/10/21/apple-watch-3-or-garmin-vivoactive-3/#comment-5826</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetsandwearables.com/?p=25226#comment-5826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One thing worth mentioning is that the garmin works with iOS, Windows, and Android. Whereas the Apple watch is only an option if you have an iPhone!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing worth mentioning is that the garmin works with iOS, Windows, and Android. Whereas the Apple watch is only an option if you have an iPhone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: gadgetsandwearables.com @ 2026-05-07 06:07:29 by W3 Total Cache
-->