<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New feature adds snoring and coughing analysis to Ultrahuman app	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gadgetsandwearables.com/2025/12/19/ultrahuman-snoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gadgetsandwearables.com/2025/12/19/ultrahuman-snoring/</link>
	<description>News, reviews, comparisons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 12:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: miguel		</title>
		<link>https://gadgetsandwearables.com/2025/12/19/ultrahuman-snoring/#comment-35088963</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miguel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 12:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gadgetsandwearables.com/?p=17590728#comment-35088963</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have no doubt it will be paid, the moment they can claim it&#039;s from a 3rd party like they did with the afib plugins they will just throw a cost into it. 

My question is more into the usability of the feature comparing with using the sleep cycle in the first place, probably subscription cost will not be much different from the subscription and both you need to use phone to record and in sleep cycle you can already import the sleep data and probably will do the same type of analysis.

Maybe is only good for people who want all integrated inside UH app, just hope they don&#039;t put more into that feature than in Home device because selling a device that already records sound and have the same data as that plugin and then deliver less information and all those trained models only on that powerplugin analysis to put behind a paywall is quite sad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no doubt it will be paid, the moment they can claim it&#8217;s from a 3rd party like they did with the afib plugins they will just throw a cost into it. </p>
<p>My question is more into the usability of the feature comparing with using the sleep cycle in the first place, probably subscription cost will not be much different from the subscription and both you need to use phone to record and in sleep cycle you can already import the sleep data and probably will do the same type of analysis.</p>
<p>Maybe is only good for people who want all integrated inside UH app, just hope they don&#8217;t put more into that feature than in Home device because selling a device that already records sound and have the same data as that plugin and then deliver less information and all those trained models only on that powerplugin analysis to put behind a paywall is quite sad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: gadgetsandwearables.com @ 2026-06-21 17:10:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->