Google’s notice says the old Fitbit Community has officially become the Google Health Community. It also says the old space will become read-only, but from what we can see, old Fitbit Community pages now redirect into Google’s new forum and there does not appear to be a clear way to browse the previous discussions.

Another Fitbit identity fades into Google Health

This move has been coming for a while. Google has steadily been pulling Fitbit deeper into its wider health ecosystem, and the community migration now makes that shift much more visible to everyday users.

The original Fitbit Community had built up years of activity around products such as Charge, Versa, Sense and Inspire. It became one of the main places people went for troubleshooting advice, feature discussions, software complaints and general user-to-user support. In many cases, community posts were often more useful than official documentation.

Now the branding has changed completely. The replacement sits under the Google Health Help Community banner and follows the same design language as Google’s wider support ecosystem. Fitbit product categories still exist, but the centre of attention is no longer Fitbit itself.

The old Fitbit forum structure appears gone

Google’s message says the old Fitbit Community “will turn to read-only”, but that wording does not quite match the current user experience. When trying to access the old Fitbit forum, users now appear to be pushed into the Google Health Community instead of landing inside a browsable archive of the old discussion pages.

That creates an awkward gap. The old forum is no longer available. Which may be an issue for users who relied on years of old troubleshooting threads. Even if you try to access individual Fitbit Community forum threads via Google Search. They will open briefly before redirecting to the new Google Health Community pages.

For newer users, this may not be a big issue. But for long-time Fitbit owners, it removes another familiar part of the Fitbit experience and reinforces the same direction we have seen elsewhere. Fitbit is no longer sitting beside Google Health as a separate community, it is being folded into it.

Google Health branding keeps expanding

The timing also lines up with several other recent changes. Google has increasingly been pushing the Google Health name across subscriptions, apps and wearable services, while Fitbit branding has become more product-focused rather than ecosystem-focused.

Fitbit Air, Google Health Premium and the broader changes to the Fitbit app experience all point in the same direction. Google no longer seems interested in running Fitbit as a mostly separate platform. Instead, for better or worse, Fitbit increasingly looks like one layer inside a much larger Google health strategy.

The post Google Health has now replaced Fitbit’s old community forums appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

That means a metric such as sleep can have several versions inside the same app. If Fitbit Air, Apple Health, Garmin, Oura, WHOOP, Withings and Eight Sleep all contribute data, Google Health can show those sources separately depending on what is connected and what each service shares.

The useful part is that users can switch between available sources for a metric and view each source’s version of the data. That is a more practical approach than making people jump between separate apps just to compare numbers.

Source views are the key feature

The important part here is not just that Google Health can connect to multiple services. Plenty of health platforms can collect outside data, but they do not always make it easy to inspect each source separately.

Google Health’s source view gives users a cleaner way to see what each connected source recorded. That is useful because devices and services often disagree on things such as sleep duration, resting heart rate, HRV and recovery trends.

This should help anyone who tracks the same metric in more than one place. You can open a category, move between sources and see whether the numbers line up or whether one device is telling a different story.

For iPhone users, Apple Health can also sit inside this setup as one of the available sources. That is useful because many wearables and services already write data there, which gives Google Health another route into a user’s existing health history.

Priority is still the awkward bit

Google Health can show several sources for the same metric, but user control over priority still looks limited. Fitbit and Google Pixel sources appear to sit first by default, with no obvious way to move another source ahead of them across the app.

That is fine for users who want Fitbit or Pixel data to lead. It becomes less ideal for anyone who uses another device as their main tracker while keeping Fitbit in the mix for sleep, passive tracking or Google Health features.

This is the distinction Google needs to make clearer. Source tabs let users inspect each version of the data, but they do not appear to act as a full priority system.

Some Fitbit-specific metrics also seem to operate differently from the wider source system. Cardio load appears tied to Fitbit device data, while sleep score and readiness also seem to rely on Fitbit-collected information.

That does not make source views less useful. It simply means users should not assume that every connected source can feed every Google Health or Fitbit score.

This is useful, but not complete

This feature makes Google Health more useful for real-world wearable setups. Many people already use more than one device, and source-level viewing gives them a better way to check what each one recorded.

The remaining gap is priority. Until Google makes that clearer, the app looks strongest as a place to inspect and compare source data, rather than a fully transparent system for deciding which source drives every metric.

The post Google Health now brings Apple and other wearable data into one app appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The complaints follow Fitbit update 3.57.1.2.910093395.release. While some users managed to restore tracking by re-enabling permissions or restarting devices, others say the permissions page itself appeared broken and would not allow access to be restored.

The same type of bug keeps returning

The frustration is not really about one failed update. It is that users say similar problems have appeared repeatedly over the past year.

Comments across Reddit describe updates breaking sleep tracking, step counts, SpO2 readings and syncing. One user said they had disabled auto updates entirely. Another said they only realised their blood oxygen tracking had stopped after checking the Fitbit app days later.

That is the awkward thing about background health features. Users expect them to work quietly without needing constant attention. Once people start checking permissions after every update, confidence in the software starts to disappear.

Fitbit acknowledged the issue

This does not appear to be an isolated complaint from a single user. FitbitHelpCommunity responded publicly and said work was underway to restore access to SpO2 and skin temperature tracking after the recent firmware update.

Thank you for the detailed feedback regarding the recent firmware update (3.57.1.2.910093395.release).

We regret the disruption to your health tracking experience caused by these permission resets. Work is underway to restore access to SpO2 and skin temperature tracking features. We appreciate your patience while this is being resolved.

Another community response later claimed the issue had been resolved. However, some users are still reporting problems in the discussion thread.

Not everyone seems affected. One commenter said their Pixel Watch had been stable for over a year. But enough users are reporting similar behaviour that it is becoming a recurring theme around Pixel Watch software updates.

Premium watch, frustrating software

The bigger problem for Google is perception. Pixel Watch 3 and 4 sit in the premium smartwatch category, where buyers expect reliable health tracking without random interruptions.

That matters even more after the recent Fitbit Air release. Google is now pushing further into screenless, passive health tracking, where users are asked to trust the app, the sensors and the background data pipeline without much direct interaction.

That is why bugs involving permissions feel especially damaging. SpO2 and skin temperature are passive features that should work automatically in the background. When updates silently disable them, the watch starts to feel unreliable even if the hardware itself is solid.

Google has improved Pixel Watch hardware steadily over the past few generations. But the software side still feels less consistent than it should in 2026, particularly for products positioned around serious everyday health tracking.

The post Pixel Watch 3 and 4 update breaks SpO2 and skin temp data appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Fitbit Air changes the argument

What is interesting about Fitbit Air is not that it doesn’t have a screen. That is only the obvious part. The more interesting bit is that Google has made a fairly simple pitch at a fairly simple price.

For $99, users get a screenless band that focuses on passive health tracking rather than apps, calls, notifications and wrist interaction. It does not need to beat WHOOP feature for feature to be a problem. It only needs to convince enough people that background health tracking does not need to cost hundreds per year.

That is why WHOOP’s reaction has been so revealing. DC Rainmaker described the company as moving quickly onto the defensive after Fitbit Air appeared, with Reddit posts, social media comments and a longer list of future features arriving in quick succession.

The uncomfortable bit for WHOOP is price. Fitbit Air comes in cheap, works without a mandatory subscription and still gives Google a route into paid health coaching for those who want more. WHOOP still has the deeper athlete-focused platform, broader wear positions and a mature coaching setup. But the old assumption that screenless tracking belongs mainly to subscription-heavy performance wearables now looks weaker.

Apple has the same gap

This is where Apple comes in. Apple Watch is the most complete smartwatch platform, but completeness is also part of the problem. It is a screen, a notification device, a payment tool, a fitness tracker, a phone extension, a sleep tracker and a small computer on your wrist.

That works brilliantly for millions of people. It also means Apple Watch asks for permanent wrist space. If you want continuous Apple Health data, you pretty much need to wear the Watch. If you want to wear a mechanical watch, dress watch or something lighter at night, you either give up tracking or wear two devices and look like you are trying to win a wrist-based argument with yourself.

A band makes more sense than a ring

The obvious counterargument is that Apple could make a ring instead. That would fit the Apple ecosystem nicely. It could work with Vision Pro, Apple TV, HomePod and gesture control. It would also give Apple a neat answer to Oura and Samsung. And Apple may go down that route. It has a few patents along these lines.

But a ring is not the same product as an Apple Watch Air. It has different compromises.

Rings can be awkward for weight training, sport and people who work with their hands. Sizing can be annoying. Some users also worry about swelling, scratches and comfort. For sleep, rings can work well. For workouts, a wrist or arm-based tracker often makes more sense.

A screenless Apple band would sit in a better middle ground. It could use proven optical sensor placement, support straps for different wear positions and feed directly into Apple Health, Fitness and Workout data.

That is why the “Air” idea works. Not Air as in thin for the sake of thin. Air as in lighter, simpler and less demanding.

Apple already has the hard part

The good thing for Apple is that it already has the hard part done. The Health app, Fitness, Activity rings, sleep tracking, heart rate zones, training load and all the usual watch metrics are already there. A screenless Apple Watch Air would not need to invent a new ecosystem. It would just give people a smaller way to stay inside the one they already use.

That is the real point. This would not be a cheaper Apple Watch with the fun removed. It would be the thing you wear when you do not want the full Watch on your wrist. Sleep, recovery, basic workouts, background health tracking and maybe a few taps or haptics. Leave the calls, apps, Wallet, ECG and proper workout screen to the main Watch.

Apple may worry about cannibalising the Watch SE, but that feels like the wrong fear. The bigger risk is letting Fitbit Air, WHOOP, Oura or Garmin Cirqa own the “quiet wearable” slot while Apple keeps asking people to wear a screen all day and all night.

Fitbit Air makes the idea easier to understand. It is not a bad smartwatch. It is a health sensor for the times when a smartwatch feels like too much.

The post Has Google just made the case for an Apple Watch Air appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

You can check Fitbit Air on Amazon, while WHOOP is available from the WHOOP website.

Price and subscription

The price difference is the easiest part of this comparison to understand. Fitbit Air costs $99.99 upfront and core tracking works without a required subscription, while Fitbit Premium remains optional at $9.99 per month. It also comes bundled with Google AI Pro and Ultra plans, so that’s something to be aware of.

That paid layer adds Google Health Coach and extra Premium features, but it is not needed just to keep the device useful. This gives Fitbit Air a cleaner entry point for people who want passive tracking without signing up for another annual payment.

WHOOP 5.0 takes the opposite route. The hardware has no upfront cost, but membership is required and starts at $199 per year, with higher tiers going up to $359 per year.

That changes the long term maths quickly. Over three years, Fitbit Air can stay close to $100 if you skip Premium, while WHOOP lands between $597 and $1,077 depending on the membership tier.

Design and comfort

Both devices remove the screen, so the phone app does most of the work. That means no glancing at stats on the wrist, no widgets and no on-device workout controls in the traditional fitness band sense.

But Fitbit Air is the lighter device. Its pod weighs 5.2 grams, which makes sense for something designed to sit in the background during the day and overnight.

WHOOP 5.0 is heavier at around 10 grams and its pod is also larger. But it gives users more flexibility. It can sit on the wrist, bicep, calf or inside WHOOP apparel, which is useful for gym sessions, contact sports or anyone who dislikes wrist tracking during workouts.

This is a clear split. Fitbit Air wins if you want the smallest and least intrusive option. WHOOP wins if placement flexibility is part of the reason you want a screenless tracker. Granted, Fitbit may over time introduce other wearing options.

Sensors and health tracking

As far as sensors, a big technical gap is heart rate sampling. WHOOP 5.0 samples heart rate at 26Hz, while Fitbit Air sits around 0.5Hz, or roughly once every two seconds.

That does not automatically mean WHOOP will always be more accurate in every situation. Fit, placement and algorithms still count. But on paper, WHOOP is clearly built for denser continuous heart rate capture.

Fitbit Air still covers the main health metrics. It tracks heart rate, SpO2, skin temperature, sleep and readiness style data. It also includes PPG based AFib alerts and Cardio Load.

Fitbit Air*

Order now

WHOOP covers heart rate, SpO2 and skin temperature too, but its platform leans harder on interpretation. ECG and blood pressure insights belong to WHOOP MG, so they should not be treated as standard WHOOP 5.0 features. But they are there is you opt for this version of the device.

Fitness and recovery

Fitbit Air supports more than 40 auto detected activities. That should cover normal users who want workouts recognised without building their life around training metrics.

WHOOP 5.0 supports more than 145 activities and has the more developed recovery system. Its core experience revolves around Strain, Recovery, sleep coaching, WHOOP Age and Pace of Aging.

Fitbit Air should not be dismissed as basic though. Cardio Load uses a TRIMP based approach, which gives Fitbit’s training load system a stronger foundation than many people may expect from a small screenless tracker.

The difference is how far each platform goes. Fitbit Air gives users useful health and fitness context. WHOOP tries to turn that context into a daily recovery and training plan.

But you can get more with the Fitbit. Air brings Readiness, Cardio Load and Google Health Coach through Premium, so Google is clearly moving in the same direction. But Gemini based coaching still needs to prove itself in daily use.

Sleep

Sleep tracking is one of the closer parts of this comparison, but WHOOP does more with the data after the night is over. Fitbit Air covers the basics with sleep stages, sleep score and Smart Wake, while WHOOP 5.0 adds sleep need, sleep debt, sleep consistency and bedtime targets tied directly to recovery.

That is the important difference. Fitbit can tell users how they slept and fold that into readiness style insights. WHOOP tries to calculate how much sleep a person needs, how much they missed and what that means for recovery the next day.

WHOOP connects sleep need, strain, recovery and bedtime guidance into one system. If you train harder, sleep badly or build up a deficit, the app adjusts the recommendation around how much sleep you should aim for and how ready your body is to perform.

Battery and charging

Battery life is one of WHOOP 5.0’s stronger hardware advantages. It lasts up to 14 days, while Fitbit Air is rated for up to seven days.

Fitbit Air still looks practical for normal use. Google says a five minute charge gives around one day of battery life, so a short top-up should be enough if you forget to charge it overnight.

Fitbit Air*

Order now

WHOOP has the better charging setup for continuous tracking. Its slide-on PowerPack lets users charge while still wearing the device, while Fitbit Air uses USB-C charging and needs to come off the wrist.

Which one makes more sense

Fitbit Air makes more sense if you want a screenless tracker that covers the basics but don’t want to fork out a lot of cash. It is lighter, simpler and easier to recommend to someone who wants passive health tracking without a full recovery platform.

WHOOP 5.0 makes more sense if recovery is the reason you are buying. The longer battery life, more frequent heart rate sampling, broader wear positions and deeper coaching system give it a clear edge for serious training.

So the split is fairly clean. Fitbit Air wins on price, weight and subscription flexibility. WHOOP 5.0 wins on battery life, wear options, sampling rate and recovery depth.

That makes Fitbit Air a real threat, but not because it beats WHOOP at its own game. It makes screenless health tracking cheaper and easier to try, while WHOOP remains the more complete option.

You can check Fitbit Air on Amazon, while WHOOP is available from the WHOOP website.

Tech specs comparison

The post Where Fitbit Air wins vs WHOOP and where it still falls short appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The free app still does the basics

Google is splitting the new Health app into a Base experience and a Premium experience. Base is included in the Google Health app when paired with a watch or tracker. It covers activity tracking, sleep tracking, health metrics and wellness logging.

That means steps, calories, distance, cardio load, readiness, sleep score, sleep schedule, sleep duration, sleep stages, heart rate, HRV, breathing rate, SpO2 and health records all sit in the standard layer. Users also get logging for weight, nutrition, water intake, moods and cycles.

That is not a barebones app. For many users, it will probably cover enough. The real difference comes when Google starts adding coaching and interpretation on top of those numbers.

Premium is where the AI layer sits

Google Health Premium adds the more advanced layer. That includes Ask Coach, which lets users ask health questions around the clock and receive personalised answers and insights. It also includes weekly fitness plans that adapt around goals and daily life.

Sleep gets a deeper layer too. Premium adds personalised summaries with coaching insights, rather than only showing scores and stages. The same applies to broader health and fitness trends, where Google promises proactive insights and guidance across metrics.

Medical record summaries may become one of the more interesting parts. Google says Premium can summarise medical records and allow users to ask questions that feed into coach recommendations. That could make the app feel less like a fitness dashboard and more like a personal health hub, assuming the execution holds up.

Fitbit Air buyers get three months of Google Health Premium included. After that, the subscription costs $9.99 per month or $99 per year if taken on its own. That is the part many buyers will notice first, but it is not the only route into Premium.

AI Pro changes the equation

Google says Google Health Premium is now included at no extra cost with Google AI Pro and Ultra plans. That is the important bit. For $20 per month, AI Pro users now get access to Google’s AI tools and the premium health platform in the same subscription.

That makes AI Pro look more attractive than it did a year ago. It already brings higher limits across Gemini and other Google AI products, including Flow, Gemini Code Assist, CLI and Antigravity. It also includes 5TB of storage and Home Premium.

Fitbit Air benefits from the bundle

This helps Fitbit Air in a very practical way. The device has no screen, so its value depends heavily on the app experience. If a buyer already pays for Google AI Pro, Fitbit Air effectively becomes a $99 tracker with the Premium software already covered.

That is a cleaner pitch than asking someone to buy hardware and then add another separate subscription after three months. It also gives Google a different model from WHOOP, where the membership sits at the centre of the product. Google can sell cheap hardware, offer a trial and let AI Pro absorb the premium layer for people already inside its wider ecosystem.

The post Fitbit Air gives Google AI Pro an unexpected upgrade appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The rollout is due to happen between May 19 and May 26 for most users. The redesigned app is organised into four main sections: Today, Fitness, Sleep and Health.

Unfortunately, as part of this shift Google is cutting back several features that gave Fitbit its more playful and social identity over the years. Here are the details.

The old Fitbit feel is being stripped back

For starters, badges will no longer be supported. New badges will stop appearing and historical badges will be deleted after the transition period, which removes one of Fitbit’s longest running motivational hooks.

Sleep Profile is also going away. That means users will no longer receive the monthly sleep animals that tried to turn sleep patterns into something easier to understand and slightly more fun.

Of course, Google is not removing sleep tracking itself. The company says sleep score and sleep algorithms have improved. But the older Fitbit layer built around monthly sleep types will not carry across.

For Premium users, the answer seems to be Google Health Coach instead. You can still ask what type of sleeper you are, but the response will come through coaching rather than a fixed monthly Sleep Profile format.

Social features take a hit

The social side of Fitbit is being reduced quite a bit. Groups and Community Feed are being removed, direct messages are going away and users will no longer receive notifications from other users.

Profiles are changing too. The new Social profile will use your Google Account name, email address and profile picture, with approval requested when you first log in to Google Health.

That also means custom usernames and custom profile photos will no longer be supported. Your profile will also drop fields such as sex, height, weight, location and friends list, so the old privacy settings linked to sharing those fields will disappear as well.

Kid accounts are losing the ability to have or add friends. Weekly leaderboards remain, but the overall direction is clear: Fitbit’s community layer is becoming narrower and more controlled inside the Google Health structure.

Some health tracking details are going away

A few health metrics are also changing or disappearing. Estimated Oxygen Variation will no longer be available, with Google pointing users toward SpO2 data in the Health tab instead.

Fitbit Sense and Versa 3 users will also lose Snore Detection. Skin temperature minute by minute data is being removed too, although daily and weekly skin temperature trends will remain available.

Stress tracking is changing shape rather than disappearing completely. Graphs of stress checks will no longer appear in the mobile app, while the old numerical Stress score is being replaced by Resilience.

That Resilience score will use labels such as Optimal, Balanced and Low instead of a number. This fits the broader Google Health approach, which seems less focused on old Fitbit style dashboards and more focused on interpreted guidance.

Blood glucose tracking is being trimmed as well. Users will no longer be able to add symptoms or set reminders to check glucose levels, although glucose data can still be imported through Health Connect or Apple Health and logged manually.

Google is pushing Fitbit toward coaching

The replacement app is not just a cleanup job. Google is moving the experience toward coaching, weekly targets and broader health context.

The Fitness tab will include activity tracking, workout videos and weekly cardio load. For Google Health Premium users, it will also house personalised weekly fitness plans created with Google Health Coach.

Daily cardio goals are being replaced by a weekly cardio target. That is a sensible change in theory, because training and recovery rarely fit neatly into identical daily boxes.

VO2 max is also changing. The old Cardio Fitness Score name is going away and the new VO2 max calculation will use GPS run data, with the option to include connected third party app data.

Food Plans are being removed, too. Users will still be able to set a personalised calorie target in the Nutrition section and set macronutrient targets, but the old calorie plan structure will not continue.

Recipes are being removed for Premium users. That is another small sign that Google wants Health Premium to revolve around coaching rather than keeping every old Fitbit Premium content feature intact.

The transition may annoy long time Fitbit users

There is a clear logic behind the redesign. Google wants one health app that can handle Fitbit data, Pixel Watch data, third party connections, health records and AI coaching in a cleaner way.

But that does not mean every removal will land well. Fitbit users who still care about badges, Groups, Sleep Profile animals or direct messaging may see this as another piece of Fitbit culture being filed down.

The timing is also worth noting. Social experiences in the old Fitbit app will be locked from May 12, which means users will not be able to add or remove friends and leaderboards will stop updating before the full Google Health rollout begins.

Data tied to removed features will remain available to download or delete until July 15. After that, Google says it will begin deleting that data from its systems.

The new Google Health app may become more useful over time, especially if Google Health Coach proves genuinely helpful rather than just another chat layer. But the trade off is obvious: Fitbit is becoming more Google and some of the old Fitbit personality is being left behind.

The post Google Health app drops badges, sleep animals and social features appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Compared with Charge 6, the missing screen is only the obvious difference. Fitbit Air also changes the fit, the sensors, the workout experience and how much control you have from the wrist.

Check Fitbit Air on Amazon and Fitbit Charge 6 on Amazon for the latest prices.

The screen changes everything

But let’s roll back.

The most obvious difference is also the one that will decide the purchase for many people. Fitbit Air has no screen. That means you cannot glance at your wrist to check heart rate, steps, pace, workout time or battery level. You also lose the small daily nudges that make a tracker feel alive during the day.

Charge 6 still behaves like a normal Fitbit. You can start workouts from the wrist, check stats mid-session, see notifications, use timers and interact with Google services. That sounds basic, but it is exactly what many Fitbit users still want. A tracker without a screen can feel cleaner, but it can also feel strangely invisible.

Fitbit Air*

Order now

That invisibility may suit some people. Air looks better for sleep, recovery tracking and all-day wear under clothing. It weighs only 12 grams with the band and the pebble itself is 5.2 grams. Charge 6 comes in at around 30 grams, which is still light, but not in the same barely-there category.

Google has also gone with a two-part setup. The main pod, which Fitbit calls the pebble, slots into interchangeable bands. Buyers can choose between Active, Elevated and Performance styles depending on material and look. The limited edition version is especially nice looking, even if it costs extra.

Fitbit Air is simpler, but not clearly stronger

Google says Fitbit Air brings a 15 percent improvement in sensor accuracy over the previous generation Fitbit. That is a useful claim, especially if Air improves day-to-day heart rate, sleep and activity tracking. It also has automatic workout detection, so users do not need to start every session manually.

Still, there is a catch. Fitbit Air does not appear to use the newer sensor approach found in Pixel Watch 4, which includes a multipath optical heart rate sensor and a far-field temperature sensor. Air sticks with a more traditional setup, including optical heart rate, red and infrared SpO2 sensors, skin temperature variation, accelerometer and gyroscope.

That does not make it weak. It does mean expectations should stay grounded. Wrist-based optical sensors often struggle most during high-intensity intervals, rapid heart rate changes and activities with lots of wrist movement. If Google wants Air to act like a passive recovery band, the sensor package may be enough. If buyers expect Pixel Watch 4-level tracking performance, that is probably the wrong comparison.

Charge 6 has its own advantage here. It includes ECG hardware and EDA sensors, neither of which appear on Fitbit Air. That gives Charge 6 a broader health feature set, especially for users who value on-demand ECG readings or Fitbit’s stress scan tools.

Air does still include FDA-cleared background AFib detection, which means it can watch for signs of irregular rhythm passively in the background. What it cannot do is offer manual ECG spot checks directly from the wrist like Charge 6.

The same logic applies to menstrual cycle tracking and more advanced health insights. Fitbit Air can track skin temperature variation, but its older sensor setup may limit how far Google can push some of the more advanced interpretation. Google Health Coach may still add value through context and trend analysis, but coaching can only work with the signals the hardware collects.

Battery life is not an upgrade

Fitbit Air lasts up to seven days. Fitbit Charge 6 also lasts up to seven days. That makes the battery story a bit awkward for Air, because dropping the screen does not bring a longer advertised runtime.

Air does charge faster, though. Google quotes 90 minutes for a full charge and around one day of use from five minutes on the charger. The charger also does not need to be oriented in a specific direction when attaching to the device, which is a small but useful convenience.

Fitbit Air*

Order now

The screenless design also changes how alerts work. Air includes a vibration motor for Smart Wake alarms, regular alarms and low battery notifications. There is also a small LED used for battery status and pairing feedback.

Charge 6 takes around two hours to fully charge. It also loses battery faster when features such as always-on display and SpO2 tracking come into play. So Air may feel more efficient in real life, even if the headline battery number stays the same.

Charge 6 still wins for fitness

For workouts, Charge 6 remains the stronger device. It has built-in GPS and GLONASS, more than 40 exercise modes, heart rate broadcasting to compatible gym equipment and wrist-based workout controls. You can run without carrying your phone and still see your stats as you go.

Fitbit Air relies on connected GPS through the phone. That is fine for casual users who already take their phone on walks or runs. It is less appealing for anyone who wants the tracker to operate independently outdoors.

The lack of screen also changes the workout experience. Air can log activity automatically and record app-started workouts, but it cannot show pace, heart rate zones or elapsed time on the wrist. That pushes it closer to WHOOP-style passive tracking than a classic Fitbit fitness band.

Still, Air is not completely stripped back. It supports Cardio Load, Daily Readiness and heart rate broadcasting to certain compatible devices and gym equipment. Heart rate is also stored at 2-second intervals, which should help preserve workout detail reasonably well for a screenless tracker.

One odd limitation is offline storage. Air can keep seven days of detailed motion data, but only one day of workout data before syncing. That feels slightly restrictive for a device built around passive tracking.

Which one should Charge 6 owners buy

Charge 6 owners should not treat Fitbit Air as a straight upgrade. Air is lighter, cleaner looking and cheaper. It also brings automatic activity logging and improved sensor accuracy compared with Fitbit’s earlier tracker generation.

But the trade-offs are big. You lose the screen, built-in GPS, ECG, EDA, NFC payments, Google Maps, YouTube Music controls and on-wrist workout stats. You also do not gain longer battery life. For many Charge 6 users, that makes Air feel more like a second device than a replacement.

Fitbit Air makes more sense for people who want a low-profile health tracker to wear all day and all night. It could also work well for Pixel Watch users who want something lighter for sleep tracking while keeping a smartwatch for daytime use. Google is clearly leaning into that idea, with Air positioned as a background tracker rather than a mini smartwatch.

Charge 6 remains the better all-rounder. Fitbit Air is the more interesting product, but Charge 6 is still the safer buy for most people who want one Fitbit to handle workouts, health checks and daily wrist interaction. Air is for people who want less on the wrist, not more.

Check Fitbit Air on Amazon and Fitbit Charge 6 on Amazon for the latest prices.

The post Should Charge 6 owners move to Fitbit Air vs stay put appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The earlier leaks had the broad direction right. Fitbit Air is a lightweight, screenless wearable built around passive health and activity tracking rather than apps, maps or smartwatch features. It sits somewhere between a classic Fitbit band and a WHOOP style recovery tracker.

A screenless Fitbit with a tiny pod

The device uses a two part design. The main tracker is a small pod, which Google calls the pebble, and that slots into a swappable band. The pod is made from polycarbonate and PBT plastics, while the band material depends on the version chosen.

Google is offering three core band types: Active, Elevated and Performance. That gives the device more flexibility than a fixed tracker design, especially for users who want different setups for workouts and everyday wear. There’s also a special Stephen Curry edition.

The weight is very low. Fitbit Air comes in at 5.2 grams without the band and 12 grams with the band attached. That is the whole point of this type of device. It is meant to disappear on the wrist and collect data in the background.

The sensor package is more complete than the design suggests

Fitbit Air tracks sleep, steps and daily activity. It also supports automatic exercise detection, Cardio Load, Daily Readiness and FDA certified background Afib detection. There is no manual ECG feature, so this is not trying to replicate the health toolkit of a Pixel Watch.

The sensor package includes an optical heart rate monitor, red and infrared sensors for SpO2 monitoring, a skin temperature sensor, a 3 axis accelerometer and a gyroscope. That gives Google enough hardware for daily health trends, sleep analysis and basic workout tracking, even without a display. The heart rate setup saves readings at two second intervals.

There is also a vibration motor for smart wake alarms, regular alarms and low battery alerts. A small LED handles battery status and pairing. Bluetooth 5.0 is included, as is heart rate broadcasting to certain equipment and devices, similar to Charge 6.

Battery life and GPS keep it simple

Battery life is rated at seven days. A five minute quick charge gives around one day of use, while a full charge takes 90 minutes. That puts it in familiar Fitbit territory, rather than the multi week range some screenless rivals chase.

The storage setup is slightly odd. Fitbit Air keeps seven days of detailed motion data, but only one day of offline workout data. That should be fine for most users, although it may annoy people who train away from their phone for longer periods.

There is no GPS built into the device. Outdoor workouts use connected GPS from a phone, so runners and cyclists will still need to carry their handset if they want route tracking. Water resistance is rated to 50 metres, so swimming and shower use should be covered.

Fitbit becomes Google Health

The more important part of this launch may actually be the software side. Google is rebranding the Fitbit app and Fitbit Premium into something called Google Health, continuing the gradual shift away from the Fitbit identity.

That includes a redesigned app experience built around Google Health Coach, an AI assistant powered by Gemini. According to Google, the assistant can use sleep data, heart rate trends, activity tracking and even meal photos to generate personalised recommendations.

Fitbit Air*

Order now

The pitch is broader than fitness alone. Google says Health Coach can suggest training plans, sleep advice, recovery guidance, nutrition tips and injury recommendations based on the user’s goals and overall health profile.

In some regions, users may even be able to connect medical records into the system. That gives Google a much larger pool of data to work with than traditional fitness platforms typically use.

Subscription optional, unlike WHOOP

One important detail is that Fitbit Air still works without a subscription. Buyers get three months of Google Health Premium included, but the tracker does not become useless once that expires.

That is a notable difference from WHOOP, where the hardware is tied tightly to the membership model. With Fitbit Air, users can still access the core tracking features without paying monthly fees. The subscription layer mainly unlocks the AI coaching side of the platform.

That could make Fitbit Air appealing to users who want passive tracking without fully committing to another recurring subscription. Granted, the software experience is very different from what you get on Whoop. Which is the main advantage of the other platform.

Google is revisiting an old Fitbit idea

There is also something slightly familiar about this whole approach. Early Fitbit devices were small, simple trackers that faded into the background. They counted steps, logged sleep and stayed out of the way.

Over the years, Fitbit gradually moved toward full smartwatch territory. Fitbit Air feels like Google reversing course a little and returning to the idea that wearable tech does not always need a bright screen attached to it.

Fitbit Air*

Order now

Whether people actually want to move back toward invisible fitness tracking is another question. But after years of increasingly complicated smartwatches, Google clearly thinks there is room again for something simpler

The post Google Fitbit Air launches with no screen and a big AI health push appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The update also adds a refreshed Sleep Score experience, conversational check-ins with Coach, personalized messages in the Today tab and sleep log editing on Android. Looking at where Fitbit is heading, it also feels like another strong hint that the rumored screenless Fitbit Air is getting closer.

Coach becomes less rigid

The biggest shift here is clearly Fitbit Coach. Previous scheduled plans are being retired in favor of something much more flexible. Instead of being told exactly what to do on fixed days, users now receive personalized weekly targets based on their health goals and recent activity trends.

That includes workout recommendations designed to help hit those targets, but users can also choose to do things their own way. It is a smarter approach because real life rarely follows a perfect Monday-to-Friday training schedule.

The updated interface shows this in action. One example includes a weekly goal to complete four full-body sessions, alongside a weekly step target of 25,000 steps and guidance explaining how daily movement supports weight loss and general fitness. Another screen highlights quick access to workout categories like strength, cardio, yoga and mobility.

Proper workout execution arrives

Fitbit is also adding step-by-step workout guidance for Coach workouts. Instead of just showing a plan or recommendation, the app now walks you through the session as you train, with each exercise broken down step by step.

This matters more than it sounds. If Google is preparing for a screenless Fitbit Air device, app-based workout control becomes much more important. Without a display on the wearable itself, the phone app needs to handle things like workout selection, guidance and progress tracking.

The new “Start a workout” section fits perfectly into that idea. It might be groundwork for hardware that depends heavily on the phone experience.

More coach messages, more conversation

Fitbit is also pushing harder on its conversational AI coaching. Users will now see more personalized messages throughout the day in the Today tab, including Morning Moments, post-workout summaries and end-of-day or end-of-week updates.

Text check-ins with Coach have also been refreshed so interactions feel more natural. Fitbit says plan adaptation through direct conversations with Coach is coming next, with users soon able to adjust workouts using chat or dedicated Adapt buttons in the Fitness tab.

That feature is not live yet, but it shows where this is going. Fitbit clearly wants Coach to become the centre of the app experience, rather than just another tab people occasionally visit.

Sleep still matters too

While fitness is getting most of the attention, Fitbit has also updated Sleep Score with a more transparent breakdown of how the score is calculated. That is a sensible move because users have been asking for more clarity around why a score moves up or down.

Android users also now get the ability to manually edit sleep logs, with iPhone support expected later. That should help fix those frustrating nights where sleep detection misses the mark.

Some early user reactions suggest not everyone loves the redesign, particularly with some health metrics like vitals feeling more buried inside the app. That tension makes sense. Fitbit built much of its reputation on passive health tracking, and some users are wary of fitness coaching becoming too dominant.

Still, if Fitbit Air is really coming, this direction makes sense. A screenless wearable needs strong software to justify itself, and Coach is clearly becoming the platform Google wants people to rely on most. The latest info is that the new tracker will land in mid-May.

Change-log, Fitbit app version 4.68

• Fitness Coach Recommendations
  Fitbit has updated fitness coaching to provide a more flexible experience. Coach now offers personalized weekly targets and tailored workout recommendations based on your health goals.
• Step-by-step Workout Execution
  Coach workouts now include step-by-step guidance, allowing workouts to be completed directly inside the app instead of only showing recommendations.
• Adapt your Fitness Plans (coming soon)
  A future update will allow workout plans to be adjusted through conversations with Coach or by using Adapt missions and Adapt workout buttons in the Fitness tab.
• Coach Messages in the Today tab
  The Today tab now includes personalized messages such as Morning Moments, post-workout summaries and end-of-day or end-of-week updates.
• Conversational Check-Ins
  The text check-in feature has been redesigned to make interactions with Coach feel more natural.
• Revamped Sleep Score
  Sleep Score now provides a clearer and more transparent explanation of how the score is calculated.
• Edit Your Sleep (Android only)
  Sleep logs can now be manually edited by opening the sleep summary, tapping the three-dot menu and selecting Edit Sleep. iPhone support is coming later.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Google is changing how Coach works and Fitbit Air may be the reason appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.