That gives us a much clearer picture of where Huawei is positioning these watches. The regular version stays in familiar fitness tracker territory, while the Pro pushes much closer to the premium sports watch category with upgrades that go beyond just looks.

The standard model keeps things simple

The Huawei Watch Fit 5 comes with a 1.82-inch AMOLED display that reaches up to 2,500 nits of brightness. It uses an aluminium alloy case, measures 9.5mm thick and weighs around 27 grams, so Huawei is clearly keeping the focus on a slim and lightweight design.

This is the more accessible option in the lineup, with pricing between CNY 1,099 and CNY 1,199 depending on the version. That works out to roughly $160 to $175, which keeps it in the same conversation as other upper-mid-range fitness watches rather than full smartwatch flagships.

The overall design does not move too far away from previous Watch Fit models. It is still very much a rectangular watch built for people who want a bigger screen than a band can offer, without stepping into the bulk of a full outdoor watch.

Huawei also says the watch brings improved heart rate accuracy and a new micro-stretching feature, which appears to be aimed at nudging users into short movement sessions during the day rather than only focusing on formal workouts.

The Pro model is where things get more interesting

The Huawei Watch Fit 5 Pro gets the bigger 1.92-inch AMOLED display. It also adds sapphire glass and a titanium alloy bezel, which gives it a noticeably more premium hardware setup than the standard version.

This is also where the health and sports features start to separate more clearly. The Pro includes ECG monitoring and support for diving up to 40 metres, which makes it much more than just a prettier version of the same watch.

Huawei is pricing this model between CNY 2,099 and CNY 2,199, or roughly $308 to $323. That puts it in a very different bracket, and it suggests Huawei sees this as a competitor for buyers looking at higher-end Garmin, Amazfit and Apple Watch alternatives rather than basic fitness trackers.

One important detail is that the official launch confirms the Pro brightness at 3,000 nits, not the 3,500 nits suggested by earlier leaks. It is a small correction, but it shows why launch-day confirmation still matters even when most of the hardware has already leaked.

More than just another yearly refresh

What stands out here is that Huawei did not simply add a few cosmetic upgrades and call it a day. The Watch Fit 5 Pro feels like a deliberate attempt to create more distance between the standard and premium models.

Features like sapphire glass, titanium accents, ECG and diving support push it beyond the usual “Pro” naming exercise. It starts to look less like a fitness watch with extras and more like a lighter sports watch for people who do not want something as large as a Huawei Watch GT or Watch Ultimate.

That also makes the contrast with the Watch Ultimate Design Diamond Edition more interesting. One device leans toward luxury and statement styling, while the Watch Fit 5 Pro focuses more on practical sports features with premium materials added on top.

Huawei says sales in China begin on April 29. European pricing has not been fully confirmed yet, but earlier expectations of around €199 for the standard version and €299 for the Pro still look realistic based on where the China pricing has landed.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as your preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Huawei Watch Fit 5 and Fit 5 Pro officially launch with brighter displays appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

It has been around three years since the first Huawei Watch Buds appeared, and the concept still stands out. Instead of carrying a separate charging case, the smartwatch doubles as one. Open the display and the earbuds are sitting inside, charging and ready to go.

The hidden earbuds concept returns

The core design remains the same. The circular watch face lifts upward to reveal two built-in true wireless earbuds stored inside the watch body. They attach magnetically and charge while docked, turning the watch into both wearable and earbud case.

The earbuds keep Huawei’s compact cylindrical shape and continue with the interchangeable design from the original model. There is no fixed left or right earbud. They automatically recognise which ear they are placed in and switch audio channels accordingly.

Huawei has refined the outer design with a cleaner case shape and a more premium finish. One of the most obvious visual changes is the rotating crown, which now features a red accent ring. The textured release button near the lower part of the case is still there, used to open the top section.

The company is offering multiple finishes, including titanium alloy versions with leather and metal strap options. Promotional images show a brown leather strap with visible stitching, giving the device a much more polished look than the first generation.

As before, the biggest compromise is battery space. Since the watch has to make room for the earbuds inside, there is less internal space available for a larger battery compared to a standard smartwatch.

Better charging and connectivity expected

Huawei says the new model improves connection stability and audio performance, while also refining the charging experience. Faster wireless charging is expected to be part of the upgrade, which matters more here than on a regular smartwatch because the system is powering both the watch and the earbuds.

The original Watch Buds already included over 80 sports modes, health tracking features and AI noise cancellation for calls. Watch Buds 2 builds on that same formula rather than changing direction.

The first-generation version launched at 2,988 yuan, which works out to roughly $435 at current exchange rates, and Huawei is positioning this new model as a premium product rather than a mass-market fitness watch. International availability has not yet been fully detailed, so it remains to be seen whether it will get a wider global release.

Watch Ultimate gets the diamond treatment

Huawei also used the launch event to unveil the Watch Ultimate Design Diamond Edition. This one sits at the opposite end of the smartwatch spectrum.

The version takes the already high-end Watch Ultimate and adds diamond-set details along with a much more jewellery-focused presentation. It is clearly aimed at buyers looking for a luxury statement watch rather than a rugged sports device.

This luxury version comes with an equally premium price tag. In China, the Huawei Watch Ultimate Design Diamond Edition starts at 23,999 yuan, which works out to roughly $3,500 at current exchange rates and places it far beyond the usual smartwatch category and firmly into luxury watch territory.

That makes for an interesting contrast. Watch Buds 2 focuses on convenience and practicality by combining two devices into one. The Watch Ultimate Design Diamond Edition goes in the other direction, pushing materials and presentation as far as possible.

Source: Huawei

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Huawei pairs Watch Buds 2 launch with diamond Watch Ultimate reveal appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

That adds a much clearer picture of what Google is building here. This is not shaping up to be another traditional fitness tracker with a display, but something much closer to a Whoop-style recovery band focused on all-day health monitoring and app-based insights.

Fitbit Air could be the final name

According to the latest report, the wearable will be marketed as Fitbit Air, with the fuller branding said to be Google Fitbit Air. The “Air” name is reportedly tied to the thinner and lighter design, with the idea being that it should feel comfortable enough to wear continuously without the bulk of a smartwatch.

That lines up with what we have already seen. The device looks compact, screenless and built around passive tracking rather than wrist-based interaction. Instead of checking stats directly on the wearable, the experience seems designed around collecting data in the background and reviewing it later in the app.

Stephen Curry has reportedly been wearing the device publicly since at least January, which makes this look far beyond an early prototype. Between press appearances and behind-the-scenes content, it seems clear Google has been testing this in plain sight for months.

A bigger shift may be happening in software

The more interesting part of this story may actually be the software strategy around it. It seems the subscription service that currently unlocks deeper insights and AI-powered features, is expected to be rebranded as Google Health. Fitbit’s AI-powered personal health coach, which is currently in public preview, would reportedly become Google Health Coach.

Fitbit hardware would still keep the Fitbit name, but the services around it would move more directly under the Google brand. It suggests Google wants health and wellness features to feel like part of its wider ecosystem rather than a separate Fitbit experience.

It also helps explain why earlier teaser content linked to the band ended with the colourful Google “G” logo rather than Fitbit branding. At the time that stood out, and now it makes much more sense.

The Fitbit app already hinted at it

There were already signs of this approach in the Fitbit app itself. Screens shown on a Pixel phone included a “Live data” page displaying Cardio Load, heart rate, calories burned and elapsed time. That screen does not currently exist in the public Fitbit app, which strongly suggests dedicated support for this new wearable is already being prepared behind the scenes.

This fits the wider idea of the product. Instead of acting like a smartwatch replacement, Fitbit Air looks like it is being positioned as a dedicated recovery and health tracker. It sits somewhere between a fitness band and a subscription-based coaching platform. So you will probably be able to use it alongside the Pixel Watch.

That is also why comparisons with Whoop keep coming up. The focus is less on notifications, apps and on-device features, and more on readiness, recovery and long-term health trends.

For now, Google still has not officially announced the device. But with clearer hardware images, months of public testing on Steph Curry’s wrist and now a likely product name and subscription strategy, Fitbit Air looks like it could land in the next few weeks.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Fitbit Air name emerges as Google’s screenless band takes shape appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The French Open will now allow the wearables on a trial basis, with Wimbledon and the US Open expected to follow later this year. The move comes after confusion at the Australian Open, where players including Carlos Alcaraz, Jannik Sinner and Aryna Sabalenka were told the devices were not permitted on court. To remind, these devices were already allowed on ATP and WTA Tour events.

Why the rule is changing

So why the rule change?

It all kicked off in Melbourne earlier this year. Players who regularly wear recovery bands like Whoop suddenly found themselves being told to take them off before matches, despite using them throughout the rest of the season.

There were even awkward moments on court. Carlos Alcaraz had a device hidden under his wristband during a match, while Jannik Sinner was stopped before play after an official noticed his wearable before the coin toss.

That confusion came from the fact that Grand Slams were operating under separate rules from the regular tour. The International Tennis Federation had already approved these devices, and ATP and WTA events were allowing them. But the majors were still taking a stricter approach.

Now that appears to be changing.

Players were never using them for coaching

This was never really about live coaching or someone getting tactical advice through a wrist strap. Players have been clear that the main reason for wearing these devices is recovery and health tracking.

Whoop and similar wearables track metrics such as heart rate, heart rate variability, recovery, strain, sleep, respiratory rate, blood oxygen and skin temperature. For elite players dealing with back-to-back matches, long rallies and difficult weather conditions, that data can be useful when deciding how hard to train the next day or whether the body needs more recovery.

Sinner spoke about this after the Australian Open issue, explaining that after playing in the extreme Melbourne heat, he wanted to check recovery numbers and understand how his body was responding before the next round.

Aryna Sabalenka made a similar point. She said she uses the device to monitor stress and recovery between matches and was frustrated by the ban, especially because the same wearable was allowed all year on WTA events.

Why organisers are backing it

French Open tournament director Amélie Mauresmo said the decision to allow the wearables was made in order to improve the player experience and respond to what athletes were asking for. The idea is simple enough: if players want better access to their own health data, there is little reason to block it if the technology does not affect fairness.

That is probably the key point. These are not hidden performance enhancers. They are passive trackers collecting information from the body. The argument from supporters is that data should help protect players, not be treated like an unfair advantage.

In a social media post – Whoop itself leaned heavily into that argument with the phrase “Data is not steroids”. Which is dramatic but gets the point across.

For now, the bigger takeaway is that Grand Slam tennis is catching up with the rest of the tour. The French Open is treating this as a trial, but once players start using these devices openly on the biggest stages, it will be difficult to go back.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Why the French Open is now allowing Whoop on court appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

That alone makes it an interesting device to test. The real question is not whether it can display blood pressure numbers, but how closely those readings match a clinically validated upper-arm cuff in day-to-day use. In this review, I’ll be looking at accuracy, consistency and whether this is genuinely practical as an everyday wearable.

One minute review

The Wellue BP Watch gets an important thing right: blood pressure tracking. The cuff-based system delivers reliable readings and, in my testing, this is where the device really stands out. The automatic hourly reading option is particularly useful, making it easy to build a picture of how blood pressure changes through the day without having to remember manual spot checks.

A traditional upper-arm blood pressure monitor will still remain the gold standard for absolute accuracy, but the BP Watch comes closer to that experience than standard smartwatches that claim blood pressure monitoring through sensors and calibration. That makes it far more useful for anyone who needs to keep a close eye on their numbers.

Outside of that core feature, the overall experience is limited. The wider health tracking is quite basic, sleep data can be inconsistent, sports tracking is minimal and the smartwatch features are sparse. It is also a chunky plastic device that looks and feels much more like a medical tool than a lifestyle wearable.

The other main cuff-based options are the Huawei Watch D2 and the older Omron HeartGuide. The Huawei comes in at roughly $450, so it is considerably more expensive than the Wellue’s $179, but it offers a much more complete smartwatch experience with better sleep, fitness and smart features. The Omron typically sits even higher, anywhere up to $500 depending on where you buy it.

That actually makes the Wellue BP Watch look pretty competitively priced. At $179, it undercuts both of the other proper inflatable-cuff watches by a fair margin, while still delivering the key feature, blood pressure readings.

If you are after a more rounded smartwatch or sports watch experience, you are better off looking elsewhere. But for users who prioritise blood pressure readings and want to track from the wrist, this is easy to recommend.

Wellue BP Watch can be purchased from Wellue’s website*

Design, hardware

Look & feel

The first thing that hits you with the Wellue BP Watch is the sheer thickness of the device. This is not just about the strap housing the inflatable cuff, the watch body itself is chunky too. On the wrist it has a noticeably tall profile, and that gives it more of a dedicated health device feel than a regular smartwatch. At 54 grams, it is not excessively heavy, but the thickness makes it feel more substantial than the number alone suggests.

The plastic construction reinforces that impression. It feels solid enough for everyday use, but there is little attempt to disguise its purpose as a health-focused device. More than anything, it comes across like a wrist-worn medical monitor, and in this case that is not necessarily a drawback. The design feels driven by function rather than aesthetics.

The 1.83-inch display is a good fit for this kind of device. The large screen makes readings easy to view at a glance, whether you are checking blood pressure values, pulse rate or stored measurements. It also helps the watch avoid looking disproportionately bulky, as the larger display gives the front face a more balanced appearance.

Two physical buttons can be seen on the right side of BP Watch. You use these, in combination with the touchscreen, to navigate the menus.

One thing that takes a bit of getting used to is the strap. This is not your usual smartwatch band. Instead, it uses a more specialised fastening mechanism that feels a little unfamiliar at first, but once you get used to it, it does a good job of keeping the device securely in place. Also, parallel to the strap itself is a thin inflatable piece for taking blood pressure measurements.

Overall, the BPW1 gives off a distinctly clinical feel. Between the thick case, plastic finish and its sheer wrist presence, it feels closer to a compact medical device than a conventional smartwatch. That is likely to be the immediate first impression for most people taking it out of the box.

Under the hood

The real technology inside the device revolves around its cuff-based blood pressure system. Rather than relying on software estimation, the watch integrates a micro air pump, inflatable airbag and a high-precision pressure sensor directly into the device.

When you start a reading, the cuff inflates and the internal pressure sensing system captures the oscillations in blood flow to generate systolic and diastolic values. Wellue specifies an accuracy of ±3 mmHg, which puts it much closer to a proper home blood pressure monitor than a conventional smartwatch.  

Beyond blood pressure, the watch also includes an accelerometer for movement tracking, along with heart rate and blood oxygen monitoring. These extra sensors help broaden its day-to-day health tracking capabilities.

What makes this interesting from a wearable tech perspective is that the engineering focus is very different from most wrist devices. This is first and foremost a medical-style sensing platform built around pressure measurement hardware, with smartwatch-style health tracking added around it.  

Battery life

Battery life is decent. Wellue quotes up to 15 days of standby time from the 330mAh battery, with around 7 days under more regular use. The latter is likely the more realistic figure for anyone taking multiple blood pressure readings throughout the day.

In real-world use, longevity will depend heavily on how often the cuff inflates. This is not like a standard smartwatch where battery drain mainly comes from the display and optical sensors. Here, every blood pressure reading activates the micro air pump and pressure sensing system, so more frequent checks will naturally have a noticeable impact on battery life. If you are using hourly scheduled monitoring, expect it to sit closer to the lower end of the quoted range.

Wellue BP Watch*

Order now

Charging is handled via a magnetic charger and a full top-up takes around two hours. For a device that may be used repeatedly during the day, that feels like a reasonable turnaround.

Technical specs

Blood pressure tracking

As you’d expect, blood pressure measurements are where this device separates itself from the vast majority of smartwatches. Most watches that claim blood pressure tracking use optical sensors, essentially the same light-based sensors used for heart rate monitoring, and then apply algorithms to estimate blood pressure from changes in blood flow.

These systems are useful for spotting general trends, but they are still estimates and need regular calibration against a standard cuff monitor. Studies on cuffless smartwatch methods have also shown a tendency to drift toward the calibration point, which can make them less reliable at higher or lower pressures.  

The BP Watch takes a very different approach. It uses a proper cuff-based oscillometric system built into the strap, with a micro air cuff that inflates during each reading. This is the same core measurement principle used by conventional upper-arm blood pressure monitors, just miniaturised for the wrist.

Which means that instead of estimating pressure from optical signals, it directly measures pressure oscillations in the artery. This is why the readings tend to be much closer to what you would expect from a home monitor. That medical focus is also reflected in its regulatory credentials, with the device carrying both CE marking and FDA clearance.

The difference is immediately noticeable in day-to-day use. It feels like taking a proper measurement and, in my testing, the readings were in line with a traditional blood pressure monitor. At times a few points off – but not by much.

Even the sensation is familiar, with the small cuff inflating around the wrist in a way that feels very similar to using a standard blood pressure monitor. It slowly tightens around your wrist – but not too tight that it feels uncomfortable.

But what I particularly like is the automatic reading option. You can set it to take a measurement every hour. For anyone monitoring hypertension or trying to understand how stress, activity or time of day affects their numbers, this is far more useful than the trend-style estimates most smartwatches offer. It moves the experience much closer to a wearable medical device than a standard health watch feature.

Another thing I like is that the device only takes measurements when you are at rest. If there is too much movement, it discards the reading rather than logging unreliable data, which makes the results far more useful. For the best accuracy, you should also keep your wrist roughly at heart level. That happens naturally when you are lying down, so taking readings in that position work well.

Wider health & sports tracking

Now for the less impressive part. Outside of blood pressure tracking, the wider health and sports features are much less polished. Step counting is generally fine for everyday use and gives a reasonable picture of daily movement, but beyond that the experience is a bit hit and miss.

Sleep tracking in particular was not always reliable in my testing. On a few occasions, the sleep statistics ended up with gaps if I did not sync the watch the following day, which is frustrating if you are trying to build up a continuous picture of your sleep patterns. That makes it feel noticeably less dependable than the core blood pressure functionality. And when it worked, it tended to overestimate mu sleep time.

Blood oxygen monitoring is also more limited than on many mainstream smartwatches, as it is only available on demand rather than as continuous background tracking. Heart rate monitoring works, but the sampling interval appears to be around once every minute or so. And while this is fine for general wellness checks it is not ideal if you are expecting detailed workout-style heart rate curves or more granular overnight trends.

Sports tracking is also very limited and clearly feels like an afterthought rather than a core feature. If you start a workout from the smartphone app, it will log your distance using connected GPS, but it will not record your heart rate. If you start a workout from the watch itself, connected GPS is not used, so distance tracking is missing, while heart rate is recorded directly on the device.

The problem is that those heart rate figures are often not very accurate, which makes them difficult to trust for anything beyond very casual activity. Workout syncing from the watch to the app is also inconsistent. Sometimes sessions transfer without issue, other times they simply do not, which adds another layer of frustration.

So this is not really a device I would recommend for anyone who cares about workout tracking or serious fitness use. This is not what this watch is about.

That really sums up the device quite well. As a blood pressure watch, it does its main job well. As a broader health and sports wearable, not so much, with the additional tracking features serving more as extras than reasons to buy it.

App experience & smartwatch features

The BP Watch does include a handful of smartwatch-style features, but this is very much a basic experience rather than anything close to a modern smartwatch platform. Notifications come through to the wrist, which is useful for quickly checking calls, messages and app alerts without reaching for the phone. In day-to-day use this works well enough for simple glanceable information.

Wellue BP Watch*

Order now

Beyond that, the feature set is fairly limited. You get the essentials such as alarms, basic reminders and access to stored health data, but there is very little here in terms of apps, watch customisation or smart tools. This is not the sort of device you buy for productivity features or an extended app ecosystem.

Q&A

Is the Wellue BP Watch accurate?

Yes, in my testing the blood pressure readings were in line with a standard home monitor. This is helped by the fact that it uses a proper inflatable cuff and oscillometric method rather than relying on estimated readings. Of course, traditional upper arm devices still remain the gold standard for accuracy.

Does the Wellue BP Watch take automatic readings?

Yes, and this is one of its best features. You can set it to take automatic readings at regular intervals, such as every hour, which makes it much easier to track blood pressure trends throughout the day.

Is it a good smartwatch?

Not really, at least not in the conventional sense. The smartwatch features are fairly basic, with limited smart functions, very basic sports tracking and wider health tracking that is serviceable rather than impressive. This is much more of a dedicated health device than a lifestyle smartwatch.

Is it comfortable to wear?

It is wearable, but it is definitely chunky. The watch itself is thick and the overall plastic design gives it more of a medical-device feel than a regular smartwatch.

What other options are there?

The main alternatives with proper inflatable cuffs are the Huawei Watch D2 and the older Omron HeartGuide. The Huawei is much more expensive at around $450, but offers a far more complete smartwatch experience. The Omron usually sits in the $300 to $500 range and leans even more toward the medical device side. At $179, the Wellue undercuts both by a fair margin.

Who is it best for?

This is best suited to anyone who needs regular blood pressure monitoring and wants the convenience of having that on the wrist. If accurate blood pressure readings are your priority, it is a strong option. If you want a more rounded smartwatch experience, there are better alternatives, but outside of the small number of cuff-based devices, most of them will not do a particularly good job of delivering reliable blood pressure readings.

Wellue BP Watch can be purchased from Wellue’s website*

*We are a review site that receives a small commission from sales of certain items, but the price is the same for you. Purchasing items by clicking on links in this article allows us to run this website. We are independently owned and all opinions expressed here are our own. See our affiliate disclosure page for more details.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

The post Wellue BP Watch review: Does cuff-based wrist blood pressure really work? appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The front of the box shows two versions of the watch. One comes in a silver-toned case paired with a green strap, while the other uses a darker grey finish with a dark blue strap. Interestingly, the packaging points to the green version carrying the name Evergreen Titanium, which sounds very much like an official retail colour rather than an internal placeholder.

More signs this is close to launch

The rear packaging offers a few more useful clues. The model number is shown as OPWWE261, which lines up with earlier certification sightings. More importantly for readers in Europe, the box includes importer information for the UK, the EU and Poland, strongly suggesting wide regional availability from the start.

There is also a quality control date of March 30 printed on the label. That may seem like a small detail, but it is actually one of the more interesting parts of the leak. It suggests units were already moving through final checks by the end of that month, which usually means production was already underway around that time.

Familiar hardware

From what has surfaced so far, the OnePlus Watch 4 does not appear to be trying to reinvent the formula. Earlier leaks point to a 1.5-inch LTPO AMOLED display with 466 x 466 resolution, the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 processor and Wear OS 5.0 out of the box.

The reported battery capacity of 646mAh in the 47mm case is particularly notable because that is one of the strongest parts of the current generation. If OnePlus keeps that in place, battery life could once again be one of the watch’s biggest selling points.

An IP69 rating is also being mentioned, which would keep it well positioned as a durable option for users who want something that can handle everyday wear and workouts without worry.

Honestly, not much changing is not necessarily a bad thing here. The current model already offers one of the better Wear OS experiences on Android, so a more polished refresh with updated software, refined finishes and perhaps some battery or sensor tweaks could be exactly what some buyers want.

Source: Erencan Yilmaz on X

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post OnePlus Watch 4 spotted in final packaging with UK launch clues appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The launch comes after a series of well-timed appearances on sponsored athletes, which had already strongly hinted that the device was nearing release. Those sightings now make much more sense in hindsight, as Zepp Health clearly used them to build anticipation ahead of the announcement. With the watch now confirmed, we can finally see where the company is taking its dedicated running line.

A clear step up in build quality

The first thing that stands out is the materials. Zepp Health has gone with a titanium alloy case and sapphire glass protection, which immediately gives the Cheetah 2 Pro a more premium feel than many watches in this segment.

The timepiece comes in a 48mm round case and keeps a four-button layout, a setup that should work well during runs when touchscreens can become awkward in rain or during intense sessions. The overall design keeps the sporty DNA of the original Cheetah Pro, with elements of the recently released Active 3 Premium.

Display quality also looks set to be one of the strong points here. Zepp Health is using a 1.32-inch AMOLED panel with 466 x 466 resolution and brightness rated at 3000 nits, which should keep the screen easy to read even in bright outdoor conditions. Based on our testing of the Active 3 Premium, which also uses sapphire glass, one thing to keep in mind is that the surface can pick up fingerprints quite easily, so that may be something to watch for here as well.

Like the T-Rex 3 Pro, it features dual-mode LED illumination with white and red light options that improve visibility during early morning and late evening runs, along with Boost and SOS modes that add an extra layer of confidence when training in low light.

Built around training and navigation

This is clearly a watch designed with runners in mind. The Cheetah 2 Pro supports 170 workout modes and includes satellite support across GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou and QZSS. The sensor package appears to be identical to what is available in the latest crop of Amazfit watches. But you are getting dual-band GNSS rather than single-band which should help with satellite accuracy.

Navigation features are also built in, with offline maps and route guidance included. That makes it a much more capable option for long runs, trail sessions and training in unfamiliar locations.

Amazfit has also included 32GB of storage, which should leave plenty of room for maps, workout data and offline music. Together with the built-in speaker and microphone, it also keeps the smartwatch side of the experience well rounded for day-to-day use.

As far as battery life, you can expect up to 20 days between charges. That is one of the headline figures that will likely catch attention, particularly for runners comparing it against more established names in the category.

Our takeaway

Overall, the Cheetah 2 Pro looks like a solid upgrade. There is nothing here that feels radically different on the hardware side, but the mix of premium materials, a very bright display, strong battery life and proper navigation tools points to a watch designed for runners who want serious performance features without moving into much higher price brackets.

Zepp Health has also spent the past year steadily building out its running metrics and training ecosystem, so this watch seems well placed to benefit from that broader software push. In that sense, the hardware upgrades and the company’s growing focus on performance analytics appear to complement each other quite well.

You can pick up the Cheetah 2 Pro for $449 on the Zepp Health website. Which means it is quite a bit pricier than the original which sold for $299 at launch.

The real test, as always, will be how it performs in GPS and heart rate accuracy. On paper, though, it looks like a well-rounded update to the Cheetah line with a clear focus on running and outdoor training.

Tech specs

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro is now official after weeks of athlete teases appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The device finally comes into view

The rectangular grey housing is now clearly visible on top of the wrist, sitting flush beneath the fabric strap. Previous footage left a lot of room for interpretation because all that could be seen was the orange-edged woven strap. That was enough to suggest Google and Fitbit might be working on a Whoop-style wearable, but not enough to confirm what the hardware actually looked like.

These new images change that. The slim rectangular body now appears clearly integrated into the strap. It looks compact, screenless and built to sit discreetly on the wrist rather than stand out like a traditional fitness tracker.

That low-profile look fits perfectly with the direction many had already suspected. This appears to be something designed for all-day and overnight wear, with the focus likely on recovery, readiness, sleep and passive health tracking rather than notifications or on-device interactions.

A Whoop-style direction looks increasingly likely

The lack of any visible display remains one of the most telling details. There is still nothing in these shots to suggest this is a successor to Charge, Luxe or Inspire in the conventional sense.

Instead, everything points toward a screenless band that leans into continuous metrics and app-based insights. That naturally invites comparisons with Whoop, particularly given the minimalist textile strap and discreet body design.

Google has already shown signs of shifting Fitbit more toward software and health services, so a subscription-led recovery wearable would not be a surprising move. If that is the strategy, the device could sit in a different category altogether from Fitbit’s existing trackers.

Also shown is what may be an early look at the Fitbit app experience for the new band. A “Live data” screen appears on a Pixel phone in Steph Curry’s behind-the-scenes vlog, showing workout metrics such as Cardio Load, heart rate, calories burned and elapsed time, a screen that does not currently exist in the Fitbit app.

The timing may be closer than first thought

The design appears finished enough to suggest something much closer to launch-ready hardware. What makes this even more interesting is that Steph Curry appears to have been wearing the device for around two months now, which points to testing or seeding well ahead of any official reveal. Combined with the earlier footage and now these more detailed shots, the picture is starting to come together.

For now, Google has not confirmed anything officially. But for the first time, we are no longer just looking at a strap. We now appear to be getting a proper look at the device itself, which may well be Fitbit’s next big move in the wearables space.

Source: Instagram via Droid Life

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Fitbit’s new band pictures finally show the device appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Better maps and route guidance

The biggest talking point here is navigation. Zepp Health says it has optimised route planning, while also improving the sensitivity of off-course alerts and the timeliness of turn-by-turn notifications. For anyone using the watch for runs, hikes or walks in unfamiliar areas, this could make a noticeable difference in actual use. Late prompts and overly relaxed off-route alerts are the sort of issues that can quickly become frustrating.

According to the release notes, topographic maps now support more detailed features, with improved contour line precision. That suggests users should see a cleaner and more accurate representation of elevation changes and terrain details on the wrist.

Sleep tracking gets another pass

Another part of the update focuses on sleep. Zepp Health says it has refined the algorithms to improve the accuracy of sleep tracking and the reliability of overnight records. Another addition is that heart rate variability data can now be synced to Apple Health

There are also changes to music playback, with optimised regional restrictions for podcasts and local music in certain countries. Interestingly, some users in EU markets who previously did not have access to the music app are now reporting that the feature has appeared following the update.

Zepp Health also mentions interface text improvements, bug fixes and general performance optimisation. So while this is not a major feature drop, it does bring a few worthwhile refinements.

As noted in our recent review, the Amazfit Active 3 Premium stands out for offering a lot at its price point. The sapphire glass display, four physical buttons, offline maps, strong battery life and solid running features make it feel like a very capable watch for runners and outdoor users who want serious tools without stepping into a much higher price bracket.

Full change-log

Version 3.10.0.5
Update size: 15.87MB

• Navigation: Optimised route planning, improved sensitivity of off-course alerts and improved timeliness of turn-by-turn notifications.
• Map display: Topographic maps now support more detailed features, with improved contour line precision.
• Music playback: Optimised regional restrictions for podcasts and local music playback in certain countries.
• Sleep: Refined sleep algorithms to improve the accuracy of sleep tracking and records.
• Apple Health Integration: HRV data can now be synced to Apple Health
• User interface: Optimised certain notification prompts and system copywriting.
• Miscellaneous: General bug fixes and performance optimisations.

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Amazfit Active 3 Premium update sharpens maps, sleep & music features appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The size and battery are the big clues

The filing itself clearly identifies the device as an Amazfit smartwatch and, importantly, a production unit. That usually suggests the hardware is fairly close to launch rather than an early engineering sample.

One thing that stands out straight away is the battery. At 550mAh, it is significantly larger than what we have seen on existing square Amazfit watches. That sort of capacity points to longer endurance, particularly if this is a device built with GPS-heavy sports tracking in mind.

The FCC paperwork also includes an internal antenna layout for what appears to be a square watch design. The drawing shows an internal footprint of roughly 49.5 x 42.6 mm. This should not be treated as confirmed case dimensions, but it does suggest the device may have a relatively large chassis, especially when paired with that battery size.

That combination hints at a watch aimed more at serious sports use than everyday casual wear.

Which watch could this be

The FCC paperwork does not give away the commercial name. Which means, for now we are left piecing things together from the hardware clues.

One possibility is that this is the next Bip model, namely Bip 7. That said, the unusually large 550mAh battery still makes that feel like a slightly less natural fit, even if the Bip line already includes Zepp Health’s largest square watch. The range has generally been positioned as a more affordable mainstream option, so this filing may point to something aimed a bit higher.

Another possibility is an upcoming square Active model. We recently saw the launch of Active 3 Premium. That would fit if Zepp Health wants to introduce a more premium rectangular lifestyle watch with stronger battery life.

The most interesting theory, though, is that this could be a second-generation Cheetah Square.

That idea starts to make more sense when you look at the overall package. A large internal footprint, much bigger battery and square display would fit nicely with a running-focused watch designed for longer GPS sessions, clearer on-wrist metrics and perhaps even better navigation features.

But that is not where it ends. We are expecting Cheetah 2 Pro to launch in the weeks ahead. Plenty of leaks are already floating around, including images of retail units. That model goes by number A2564, while this one carries the moniker A2568, so the numbering is fairly close.

Our takeaway

Even without an official name, this is one of the more intriguing Zepp Health filings we have seen in recent weeks because it points to a new square watch with an unusually large 550mAh battery. That alone suggests the company may be preparing something with stronger endurance than its current rectangular lineup.

If this does turn out to be a Cheetah 2 Square, the larger battery could make it a compelling option for runners and outdoor users who want longer GPS tracking between charges. For now, the branding remains unknown, but the filing strongly suggests another square Amazfit watch is moving closer to launch.

Source: FCC

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post New Amazfit square watch hits FCC with unusually large battery appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.