Image source: Google
fitbitgoogleIn focusNewssmartwatch

Pixel Watch Health Guardian is freaking out some users on its first reporting day

Pixel Watch owners are getting their first Health Guardian reports, and some of the results are a bit of a shock. “High” blood pressure and insulin resistance warnings are showing up today, including for people who say their recent tests came back normal.

Google started rolling out Health Guardian last week to Pixel Watch 3, Pixel Watch 4 and Pixel Watch 5. The system looks for longer-term patterns related to blood pressure, insulin resistance and sleep breathing quality.

Now the first monthly reports are landing, and the early reaction is a mix of surprise, concern and a fair bit of confusion.


Some results are raising eyebrows

Several early users have reported receiving a “High” insulin resistance trend despite recent glucose or A1C tests that they say were normal. Others have received a high blood pressure trend and questioned it after getting more reassuring readings from a conventional cuff.

That does not necessarily mean Health Guardian is wrong. One Pixel Watch owner with type 2 diabetes reported that the watch correctly showed high insulin resistance while showing normal blood pressure, which matched their current situation. Another user with pre-diabetes also received a high insulin resistance result.

Google blood pressure results - high

But there are enough conflicting examples to show why Google’s wording matters here.

Pixel Watch is not measuring blood pressure in mmHg, and it is not measuring blood glucose or insulin. As we explained when Google first announced these features, the watch is looking at signals it already collects and using machine-learning models to identify patterns associated with these conditions.

For blood pressure, Google analyses pulse and movement data using its WavesFM model. The end result is deliberately broad. You get a trend such as “High”, rather than a conventional reading such as 140/90.

Insulin Resistance Trends takes a similarly indirect route, combining things such as heart rate patterns, HRV, sleep, activity, skin temperature, weight and age. Again, the result is a trend rather than a blood test.

Some users say the result made them worry despite recent normal tests. Others are asking for more underlying data rather than a simple high or low classification, which is probably a fair criticism of the current presentation. If an algorithm is going to flag something potentially important, people naturally want to know what changed and by how much.


The reports are not based on just a couple of days

There is also some confusion around how Google produced these reports so quickly. Health Guardian only became visible for many users during the past few days, leading some to assume that their October 1 assessment was calculated from only a day or two of information. But that is not the case.

Google says the first Blood Pressure Trends report can appear if you wore a compatible Pixel Watch for at least five consecutive days during September. Insulin Resistance Trends requires at least seven days and nights of wear during September.

In other words, the feature does not necessarily need to have been visible in the app for a week. Google can process eligible data the watch had already collected during the previous month.

That also explains another slightly confusing part of the interface. Some users are seeing the result presented under October even though the underlying data comes largely from September. Technically, October is when the monthly report is delivered, but showing it that way makes it easy to assume the app is talking about the new month.


Our takeaway

For now, these first reports are probably best treated as a nudge to look into things rather than a result you take at face value. Day one is already showing the tricky part for Google. Putting a big “High” label on the screen is easy enough. Giving people enough context to understand why it appeared is where things get much harder.

Google’s Blood Pressure Trends feature is still very different from actually measuring blood pressure. The company is also exploring hardware that could do that, but Health Guardian is not there yet. Right now it is looking for patterns, not replacing the cuff.

Don’t miss the latest from Gadgets & Wearables

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and check out our YouTube channel.

You can also follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source in Google Search.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Marko Maslakovic

Marko Maslakovic founded Gadgets & Wearables in 2014 after more than 15 years working in the City of London’s financial sector. He has spent more than a decade testing and writing about smartwatches, fitness trackers, sports watches and connected health devices. His reviews are based on hands-on use, including real-world GPS, heart-rate, battery and workout testing. Marko personally tests and writes most of the product reviews published on the site.

Marko Maslakovic has 3288 posts and counting. See all posts by Marko Maslakovic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.