Let’s dive into the specifics.

A sharper looking budget smartwatch

The Realme Watch S5 comes with a 1.43-inch AMOLED display with 466 x 466 resolution, a 60Hz refresh rate and peak brightness of up to 1,500 nits. Always-on display support is included, although battery life drops from around 16 days to roughly five days when that mode is enabled.

One slightly unusual feature is a night vision mode that switches the display to red tones for low-light viewing. It could be useful for checking the time at night without blasting your eyes with a bright watch screen.

The body is also worth mentioning. Realme has gone with a flat-edged frame and large side buttons, which makes the Watch S5 stand out a little from the usual budget smartwatch design language. The watch weighs 32 grams without the strap and comes in Rock Grey and Sand White colour options.

GPS and sports tracking headline the fitness package

The bigger upgrade is built-in GPS with support for five satellite systems. That means users can track runs, walks and rides without carrying a phone all the time, which is still not guaranteed at this price level.

Realme says the watch supports 110 sports modes, along with features such as VO2 max, recovery duration, interval training and running courses. Whether those metrics prove genuinely useful will depend heavily on sensor accuracy, but at least Realme is offering more than just the basics.

The watch also includes heart rate, SpO2, sleep and stress tracking. Breathing exercises, sedentary reminders and women’s health tracking are part of the package too.

There are some obvious limits. The Watch S5 does not include ECG, skin temperature sensing or NFC for contactless payments. That helps explain the price positioning and keeps it away from the more advanced smartwatch category.

Gemini shortcut joins the smart features

Bluetooth calling is included, along with music controls, weather, timers, alarms and other standard smartwatch tools. One of the side buttons can also trigger Google Gemini, although this appears to work mainly as a shortcut through the connected smartphone rather than a deeply integrated on-watch AI system. Realme is also pushing voice replies for messaging, although support currently seems focused on WhatsApp.

The Watch S5 launches first in India at Rs 7,999, with a temporary launch offer dropping the price to Rs 7,499 from June 5 to June 7. Realme has not confirmed wider international availability yet, although the older Realme Watch 5 did eventually reach other markets.

The post Realme Watch S5 launches with GPS and 16 day battery life appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

For example, you get the ability to sync with a user’s calendar. Luna says the Band can also offer haptic suggestions at relevant moments, such as reminding someone to get fresh air or have coffee before a long meeting.

The broader idea behind Luna is that most people already collect more health data than they know what to do with. Instead of showing endless charts and scores, the company wants LifeOS to interpret signals in the background and surface suggestions when they are actually useful.

LifeOS becomes the real product

The Band itself handles continuous tracking, while LifeOS acts as the intelligence layer behind the scenes. Luna says the platform can combine wearable data with other inputs such as blood markers, food habits and medical context to build a more personalised model around each user.

The app will also include micro-apps covering areas such as stress, nutrition, training, supplements and productivity. Luna says additional integrations and custom health modules will arrive over time, with the aim of replacing the collection of separate wellness apps many people currently juggle.

That sounds ambitious, but the simpler approach may end up being the smarter one. Small prompts delivered at the right moment are often more useful than another dashboard full of metrics people stop checking after a few weeks.

What comes next

Luna still needs to turn the idea into something people will want to wear every day. Calendar-aware nudges sound useful on paper, but the real test is whether they feel timely, specific and worth paying attention to.

The WHOOP lawsuit also remains part of the background, even if Luna is now leaning harder into LifeOS and daily guidance. Perhaps this is why the device now looks a bit different from the original concept shown in January. Nevertheless, the product still needs to show that its value comes from more than being another screenless wearable built around health tracking.

Drop 1 starts today and is invite-only, with shipping expected at the end of July 2026. You can join the waitlist through Luna’s website.

I reviewed Luna Ring 2 earlier this year, another product from the same company, and came away fairly impressed. The app is clean, sleep tracking is fairly solid and the AI tips are more useful than expected, especially around caffeine timing. Like with most rings, workout heart rate is the weak point – but at around $300 with no subscription, it felt like a sensible Oura alternative.

The post Luna Band now wants to plan your day, not just track it appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

I reviewed the Smart Band 9 Pro last year, so I was keen to see what Xiaomi had actually changed this time. On paper, the answer is a mix of sensible upgrades and some familiar carry-overs. For the longer answer, keep reading.

View on Xiaomi’s website.

The design gets a cleaner premium push

At first glance, Xiaomi has not ripped up the Smart Band Pro formula. Not even close.

The Smart Band 10 Pro still sits in that odd but useful space between a large fitness tracker and a small smartwatch. That was already true of the Smart Band 9 Pro, which felt much closer to a smartwatch than a traditional narrow fitness band.

The difference is in the finish. The new model uses a 6M46 aviation aluminium alloy frame, while the Smart Band 9 Pro used an aluminium alloy frame with a fibre polymer rear. Xiaomi is also adding a ceramic edition this time, which gives the 10 Pro a slightly more premium angle without turning it into a full smartwatch. And you can opt for the edition with a Genuine Leather strap.

The dimensions tell a similar story. The metal Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro measures 42.84 × 32.16 × 9.7mm, while the ceramic edition comes in at 43.97 × 33.35 × 9.7mm. The Smart Band 9 Pro measures 46 × 33.35 × 9.99mm, so the new model is a little thinner and more compact, at least on paper.

Weight also improves. Xiaomi lists the 10 Pro at 21.6 grams without strap, compared with 24.5 grams for the 9 Pro. So some slight changes there, as well.

The display is the most obvious upgrade

Both models use a 1.74-inch AMOLED display with a 336 × 480 pixel resolution. That means Xiaomi has not increased the display size or pixel count. Instead, the company has focused on brightness and the way the panel sits inside the body.

The Smart Band 10 Pro gets a micro-curved AMOLED display with what Xiaomi describes as an ultra-narrow four-sided design. Peak brightness rises to 2000 nits, compared with 1200 nits on the Smart Band 9 Pro. That should be the easiest upgrade to notice outdoors.

In my Smart Band 9 Pro review, the display already stood out as one of the better parts of the device. It was bright, colourful and easy to read while running. The 10 Pro does not need to fix a weak point here. It simply pushes one of the 9 Pro’s strengths further.

That is probably the right move. Cheap fitness bands often feel cheap because of their screens, not because of the tracking. A brighter and cleaner panel helps the 10 Pro look more like a small smartwatch, even if the underlying experience remains closer to a tracker.

Health tracking finally gets HRV

The biggest health upgrade is not the sensor list itself, because both watches include an accelerometer, ambient light sensor, gyroscope, optical heart rate sensor and geomagnetic sensor. The change is in the heart-rate hardware and the extra data Xiaomi is now surfacing.

The Smart Band 10 Pro uses a new dual-light, dual-PD sensor setup. Xiaomi’s promo material also mentions 98.2% heart-rate accuracy, although that number will need real-world testing before it means much. Lab claims rarely tell the full story when wrists move, sweat builds and workouts become messy.

The more useful addition is sleep HRV. The Smart Band 9 Pro covered the basics well, including heart rate, SpO2, stress, sleep and women’s health tracking. But HRV was one of the obvious missing pieces in my review. I was hoping Xiaomi would add it then, and the 10 Pro finally does.

This matters because HRV gives Xiaomi a better route into recovery tracking. It does not automatically make the 10 Pro a serious recovery wearable, but it gives the device a stronger foundation than the 9 Pro had. If Xiaomi handles the interpretation well in the app, this could be one of the more useful upgrades.

On the topic of sleep, you also get Algorithm 2.0. It is said to improve fall-asleep and wake-up detection accuracy by 11%.

Sports tracking stays familiar

For sports, Xiaomi has kept the broad structure intact. Both devices support more than 150 sports modes, and both include GNSS with BeiDou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and QZSS. So no surprises there.

In my testing, the 9 Pro locked onto GPS quickly and performed much better than its price would suggest. On runs, it tracked close to my Garmin Forerunner 955, with only small differences in distance and heart-rate readings. That gives the 9 Pro genuine credibility as a low-cost fitness device rather than just a notification band with workout modes.

The 10 Pro adds a new cycling mode angle, with real-time data synchronisation to the phone for easier viewing. That sounds useful, especially for riders who mount their phone on the bars and want larger live data without buying a separate cycling computer.

Battery improves in the right place

Battery life looks familiar at first because both models claim up to 21 days. The difference is that Xiaomi has moved from a 350mAh battery on the Smart Band 9 Pro to a 380mAh silicon-carbon battery on the Smart Band 10 Pro.

That extra capacity does not translate into a longer headline figure, but it may help offset the brighter display and added features. With the 9 Pro, real-world battery life depended heavily on settings. Always-on display, GPS sessions and continuous health tracking could bring it down, but it still lasted well over 10 days with heavier use in my testing.

Charging is where the 10 Pro makes a clearer move. The new model supports magnetic fast charging and can reach 80% in 25 minutes. The Smart Band 9 Pro takes around 75 minutes for a full charge.

Specs comparison: Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro vs 9 Pro

The smartwatch extras are still region-sensitive

Xiaomi is also talking up HyperOS 3, Apple ecosystem support, dual-device notifications, quick command access, game mode, NFC and 5ATM water resistance. Some of this looks genuinely useful, especially the improved iPhone friendliness. Xiaomi bands have always been strongest inside Xiaomi’s own ecosystem, so better Apple compatibility could widen the appeal.

The usual warning still applies. NFC depends on region and version, so buyers outside China should not assume they will get the same payment experience shown in Chinese launch material. This was one of the weaker points of the Smart Band 9 Pro, where NFC remained restricted and less useful for global buyers.

The game mode is a stranger addition. Xiaomi shows game progress display, game status monitoring and battle reports. It may appeal to a specific crowd, but it is probably not the reason most people will buy a fitness band.

For most users, the more useful smart features remain notifications, media controls, find phone, alarms and app integration. The 9 Pro handled these well enough, though it still lacked proper replies and full smartwatch depth. The 10 Pro seems to extend the formula rather than replace it.

Bottom line

The Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro looks like a continuation of a winning formula. The brighter 2000-nit display, thinner body, lower weight, ceramic option, faster charging and sleep HRV support all move the product in the right direction.

It is not a massive rethink. The display size and resolution stay the same. Battery life remains rated at up to 21 days. Sports modes remain at more than 150, and GNSS support appears broadly unchanged.

That is not a bad thing. The Smart Band 9 Pro already had a strong base, especially for GPS, heart-rate tracking, comfort and battery life. Xiaomi did not need to rebuild it from scratch. It needed to make it feel more refined, add a few missing health metrics and keep the price sensible.

The 10 Pro seems to do that. The biggest real-world questions are accuracy, app interpretation of HRV and how many of the China launch features survive the global version. If Xiaomi gets those right, this could be one of the stronger budget-friendly wearable upgrades of the year.

View on Xiaomi’s website.

The post Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Pro changes just enough vs the 9 Pro appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Garmin Connect starts borrowing from social media playbooks

Up to now, Garmin Connect mostly treated social interaction as a two-way relationship. You connected with someone and both sides gained access based on shared permissions. The new system changes that structure quite a bit.

Garmin now says existing “connections” are becoming followers. Users can follow people they want to engage with, while mutual follows become “friends” inside the app. It is a setup that feels immediately familiar if you have used Instagram, X or Strava.

The app repeatedly reassures users that “nothing will change” in how they interact with connections. But under the surface, this is an important shift because it separates following from friendship.

That opens the door to more public facing profiles and creator-style engagement. Someone could share workouts publicly, attract followers and interact with a broader audience without approving everyone as a full connection.

Privacy settings now sit at the centre of the experience

Garmin clearly knows social features can become sensitive very quickly in a fitness app. The onboarding process spends most of its time walking users through privacy settings.

Users can decide whether follower requests require approval or whether anyone can follow automatically. Separate controls exist for profile visibility, activity sharing, steps and badges.

Garmin also offers several visibility layers including “Only Me”, “My Followers”, “My Followers and Groups” and “Everyone”. Activity privacy even includes a custom setting for assigning different privacy levels to different activity types.

That is a noticeable expansion compared to Garmin’s older setup. The company seems to be trying to strike a balance between social discovery and tighter control over health and fitness data.

Some of the wording is also quite deliberate. Garmin specifically reminds users that shared activity data may include heart rate and activity location. That suggests the company wants to avoid confusion before people suddenly discover their morning runs are visible to a much wider audience.

This could change how Garmin communities work

Garmin has slowly been leaning harder into community features over the past couple of years. Challenges, group features, comments, reactions and event participation have all become more visible inside Connect.

A follower system fits perfectly into that direction. It also creates a structure that could support athlete pages, creator accounts, coaching communities or public training journals much more cleanly than the old mutual connection model.

Strava already built a huge part of its identity around this type of social graph. Garmin has traditionally focused more on training metrics and hardware. But the lines between fitness platform and social platform have been getting blurrier for a while.

The post Garmin Connect adds followers and new privacy controls appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Google’s notice says the old Fitbit Community has officially become the Google Health Community. It also says the old space will become read-only, but from what we can see, old Fitbit Community pages now redirect into Google’s new forum and there does not appear to be a clear way to browse the previous discussions.

Another Fitbit identity fades into Google Health

This move has been coming for a while. Google has steadily been pulling Fitbit deeper into its wider health ecosystem, and the community migration now makes that shift much more visible to everyday users.

The original Fitbit Community had built up years of activity around products such as Charge, Versa, Sense and Inspire. It became one of the main places people went for troubleshooting advice, feature discussions, software complaints and general user-to-user support. In many cases, community posts were often more useful than official documentation.

Now the branding has changed completely. The replacement sits under the Google Health Help Community banner and follows the same design language as Google’s wider support ecosystem. Fitbit product categories still exist, but the centre of attention is no longer Fitbit itself.

The old Fitbit forum structure appears gone

Google’s message says the old Fitbit Community “will turn to read-only”, but that wording does not quite match the current user experience. When trying to access the old Fitbit forum, users now appear to be pushed into the Google Health Community instead of landing inside a browsable archive of the old discussion pages.

That creates an awkward gap. The old forum is no longer available. Which may be an issue for users who relied on years of old troubleshooting threads. Even if you try to access individual Fitbit Community forum threads via Google Search. They will open briefly before redirecting to the new Google Health Community pages.

For newer users, this may not be a big issue. But for long-time Fitbit owners, it removes another familiar part of the Fitbit experience and reinforces the same direction we have seen elsewhere. Fitbit is no longer sitting beside Google Health as a separate community, it is being folded into it.

Google Health branding keeps expanding

The timing also lines up with several other recent changes. Google has increasingly been pushing the Google Health name across subscriptions, apps and wearable services, while Fitbit branding has become more product-focused rather than ecosystem-focused.

Fitbit Air, Google Health Premium and the broader changes to the Fitbit app experience all point in the same direction. Google no longer seems interested in running Fitbit as a mostly separate platform. Instead, for better or worse, Fitbit increasingly looks like one layer inside a much larger Google health strategy.

The post Google Health has now replaced Fitbit’s old community forums appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

This is not one of those comparisons where the two watches are pretending to be completely different things. They share the same general shape and everyday smartwatch focus, but Bip Max pushes the format bigger, while Bip 6 keeps things lighter and a bit more polished on the wrist.

So let’s get into the detail as to what separates these two devices. It’s worth noting that this article is based on leaked information about the upcoming device. We will update it when more info becomes available.

You can check out both watches on the Amazfit website.

Bigger screen and brighter display

The display is the obvious starting point. Amazfit Bip Max is uses a 2.07 inch AMOLED, compared with the 1.97 inch AMOLED on the Bip 6. That does not sound like a huge jump, but on a square smartwatch it should be noticeable, especially for widgets, maps, workout stats and larger watch faces.

Resolution also moves up from 390 x 450 on the Bip 6 to 432 x 514 on the Bip Max. Peak brightness climbs as well, from 2000 nits to 3000 nits. So the Max is not just larger, it should also be easier to read outdoors if the leaked figure holds up.

Both watches use tempered glass with an anti fingerprint coating, so this is not a case of the Max moving to a more premium glass material. The difference here is mostly about size, pixels and brightness. That fits the visual design too, as the Max looks like it has been built to make the screen the main selling point.

Bigger body and different controls

The size difference is plain to see. Bip Max measures 49.58 x 42.76 x 10.93 mm, while Bip 6 measures 46.3 x 40.2 x 10.45 mm. The Max is wider, taller and slightly thicker. Hence the name Max!

Bip Max weighs 52.6g with the strap, while Bip 6 weighs 44g. So yes, the Max is heavier, but not by a lot. What you will probably feel more is the larger case, because the Max simply takes up more space on the wrist.

The controls also split the two devices visually. Bip Max has the more obvious crown on the right side, paired with a flat button below it. Bip 6 uses two flatter side buttons instead, which gives it a more basic control system.

More storage for music and maps

Storage is another big gap between the two. Bip Max comes with 4GB, while Bip 6 has 512MB, with around 100MB available for files. That is a sizeable difference for a budget smartwatch.

The extra space on Bip Max can be used for maps as well as music, which gives the watch a bit more standalone appeal. It also makes the Max feel less like a basic fitness watch and more like a low cost smartwatch with some proper offline capability.

Bip 6 still covers the essentials, but its available file storage is much more limited. For users who do not care about storing anything on the watch, that may not be a big issue. But if offline content is part of the appeal, the leaked Max spec has the clear advantage.

Battery life gets a clear bump

Battery capacity also moves up sharply. Bip Max has a 550 mAh battery, while Bip 6 has a 340 mAh battery. That is a large increase and it helps explain the bigger case.

Typical battery life is quoted at up to 20 days for Bip Max, compared with up to 14 days for Bip 6. As always, real use will depend on brightness, workouts, Bluetooth calling, health tracking and always on display settings. But on paper, the Max has more headroom.

WiFi joins the spec sheet

Connectivity is another area where the Max steps ahead. It adds WiFi and uses Bluetooth 5.3, while Bip 6 has Bluetooth 5.2 and no WiFi. That helps with faster syncing, updates and transferring files.

Both watches still include a microphone and speaker, so Bluetooth calling is present on both. NFC is absent from both spec sheets, so there is no difference there. The Max gets the advantage mainly through WiFi and the newer Bluetooth version.

The sensor is pretty much the same. Both include the BioTracker PPG biometric sensor with 5PD and 2LED, along with acceleration, gyroscope, ambient light and geomagnetic sensors. So this is not a sensor upgrade story.

Our takeaway

Amazfit Bip Max comes in at $100, while Bip 6 sits at $80. So this is not a huge price gap, but the two watches do start to make sense for slightly different people.

Bip Max is the one to go for if you want the larger screen, longer battery life, WiFi and more room for music and maps. It is also the bigger watch on the wrist, so that extra hardware comes with a chunkier feel.

Bip 6 is the neater option. It costs less, weighs less and keeps the same basic Bip idea in a smaller body. If you do not care about the bigger display or extra storage, that $80 model still looks like the easier everyday pick.

You can check out both watches on the Amazfit website.

Tech specs comparison

The post Amazfit Bip Max vs Bip 6: Where the newer model moves ahead appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The image looks like internal launch material. It describes Oura Ring 5 as a “smaller” and “more comfortable” ring while saying it keeps the same health-tracking capabilities and membership features as Oura Ring 4. If genuine, that suggests Oura may be focusing more on refinement than a major feature overhaul.

The timeline matches earlier clues

The screenshot lists late May for the announcement, pre-orders and sizing kits. A week later is when launch and shipments are expected to happen.

That fits the picture that has been building around Ring 5 over recent months. We spotted FCC filings for OA13 and OA14, which appeared to point to a new Oura ring and related hardware. The confidentiality timelines attached to those filings already suggested a much nearer launch window than the late 2027 estimates that had surfaced elsewhere.

There was also the brief Oura Ring 5 mention in Oura’s own sizing video flow before the reference disappeared. On its own, that did not confirm anything. But combined with the FCC activity and now this screenshot, the overall timeline starts looking more consistent.

The focus may be on comfort

The wording in the screenshot is interesting because it does not push a major new health feature. Instead, it leans heavily on size and comfort.

That would make sense for this category. Oura Ring 4 already covers the main health, sleep and recovery features most buyers expect. Making the ring smaller or less noticeable could be just as important as adding another metric inside the app. The likely direction seems to be a more refined version of the current hardware rather than a dramatic shift in appearance.

Still worth treating cautiously

There is still an obvious caveat. The screenshot has no visible source, URL or metadata, which means it could be genuine internal material or a convincing mock-up built around existing rumours and filings.

But nothing in the image clashes with what has already surfaced publicly. In fact, the timing fits unusually well with the earlier FCC trail and the accidental Oura Ring 5 reference that briefly appeared in official material.

If the dates are accurate, Oura Ring 5 could be announced on May 28 and begin shipping from June 4. That would make the next-generation ring much closer than many originally expected.

The post Oura Ring 5 screenshot hints at smaller design and June launch appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

For users, the headline feature may actually be battery efficiency. Google says watches upgrading from Wear OS 6 to Wear OS 7 should see average battery gains of up to 10%. That might not sound huge on paper, but smartwatch battery improvements tend to arrive in small steps rather than giant leaps. A modest gain can still mean getting through an extra workout, a long travel day or another night of sleep tracking without reaching for the charger.

Google is also preparing to bring Gemini to selected watches launching later this year. The company says the assistant will offer more proactive and personalised help directly from the wrist. That wording leaves plenty open to interpretation, but it is clear Google wants Gemini to become a core part of the Wear OS experience.

Wear OS is becoming more connected to Android

One of the more interesting changes is the introduction of Wear Widgets. Google is effectively aligning smartwatch widgets with the rest of Android, allowing developers to build more flexible and dynamic interfaces that work across devices.

Until now, Wear OS Tiles have handled quick-glance information on watches. Those are staying around for now, but Google is clearly steering developers toward the new widget system. The idea seems simple enough. Developers can build experiences that feel more consistent between phones and watches while reducing duplicate work.

Wear OS 7 also introduces Live Updates. These are designed to surface real-time information directly on the watch, whether that is a food delivery update, navigation progress or another ongoing task.

Gemini is starting to shape the smartwatch experience

Google also confirmed deeper support for Gemini through something called AppFunctions. This allows apps to connect directly with AI agents and assistants so users can perform actions using natural voice commands.

The example Google provided was starting a run in Samsung Health simply by telling Gemini what to do. That may sound straightforward, but it points toward a larger shift in how smartwatch software works. Instead of tapping through menus on tiny screens, Google wants users to interact conversationally.

There is also mention of automated app tasks arriving later. Google says users will eventually be able to trigger certain phone app actions directly from the watch with little or no developer work required. One example mentioned placing a DoorDash order from the wrist.

Fitness tracking is getting more standardised

Google is also trying to make life easier for fitness app developers. Wear OS 7 introduces a new Wear Workout Tracker experience that includes built-in heart rate monitoring, media controls and standard workout features.

The company says this should reduce development effort while ensuring a more consistent experience across apps. ASICS Runkeeper is already working with Google on the feature.

Enhanced media controls are also arriving in Wear OS 7. Users will be able to manage media auto-launch settings per app and switch audio outputs directly from the watch while media is playing on a phone.

Developers are getting a major toolkit refresh

Much of Google’s announcement focused on developer tools. Wear OS 7 introduces updates to Compose for Wear OS, Tiles, Protolayout libraries and Watch Face Format 5.

For most buyers, these changes will stay invisible. But they shape how apps and watch faces evolve over the next couple of years. Google appears focused on making development faster and more unified across Android devices.

The post Google’s Wear OS 7 update focuses on battery life and AI appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Why this product suddenly looks more relevant

Whoop built the premium version of the idea but Fitbit Air has now taken it mainstream. And Zepp Health already has something in the same lane without a subscription attached.

That gives Helio Strap 2 a clear opening. It does not need to beat Whoop feature for feature, and it does not need to copy Fitbit Air either. It needs to be the simpler, sports-focused option for people who want recovery and workout tracking without wearing a smartwatch all day.

That group is larger than it looks. Some people wear mechanical watches. Some already use a Garmin, Apple Watch or Amazfit watch but do not want it on their wrist at night. Others want a discreet tracker for sleep, gym sessions or recovery trends. A strap makes sense for them if it stays comfortable and the app does not get in the way.

What Helio Strap 2 should improve

As far as Strap 2, comfort should be one of the first upgrades. A screenless tracker only works if people forget it is there, so a thinner pod, softer strap and better fit would be more useful than a long list of new software labels.

Strong workout heart-rate accuracy should be another priority. Helio Strap 2 could possibly also double as a heart-rate monitor for connected watches. If worn on the upper arm, the signal should be more accurate than a watch sitting on the wrist, especially during strength training, cycling and other sessions where wrist-based readings can struggle.

Battery life should remain a key selling point. The current Helio Strap already claims up to 10 days, which puts it in a good place against Fitbit Air and keeps it well away from daily charging. A cleaner charger or faster top-ups would make the next version feel more polished without changing the idea.

The Zepp App is just as important as the hardware. With no screen on the device, the phone app becomes the whole interface. The software has improved quite a bit over the past year or so, but it still lags behind some other brands. If the app feels clunky, drops workout sessions or makes recovery data hard to interpret, the strap loses much of its appeal.

The real upgrade is smarter data handling

Zepp Health has one advantage over some rivals. It already sells watches, rings and straps, so it can build a broader health ecosystem. But that only works if the data from those devices merges cleanly.

That should be a major focus for Helio Strap 2. If someone wears an Amazfit watch during the day, a Helio Strap during training and perhaps a ring at night, the app needs to explain which device supplied the data. It also needs to avoid duplicate readings and confusing recovery scores.

When Helio Strap 2 could launch

We already have some info on a likely launch date. At its recent earnings call, it was revealed that the next-generation Helio hardware is expected in the second half of 2026. That points to a product that is already on the roadmap, but probably not days away.

The current Helio Strap also appears to be selling well. Zepp Health has been increasing production capacity, which suggests demand has been stronger than expected rather than the product being quietly phased out.

An autumn or late-2026 next-gen release would make sense. It would give Zepp Health time to respond to Fitbit Air, improve the hardware and sharpen the software story before launch. A much earlier release would need stronger signs, such as a regulatory filing, app code or a retailer leak.

Zepp Health does not need to do a drastic overhaul. The winning version is simple: thinner hardware, better comfort, software improvements and the same no-subscription pitch. 

The post Fitbit Air just made Amazfit Helio Strap 2 a lot more relevant appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

A familiar feature with a possible twist

The awkward part is that Apple already has hypertension notifications. These arrived with watchOS 26 and use the optical heart sensor to analyse how blood vessels respond over time, looking for patterns that may suggest high blood pressure.

This new report from Digitimes describes another high blood pressure notification feature that also appears to use the optical heart-rate sensor on the back of the watch. That makes the distinction slightly muddy. It could mean Apple has a more clinically validated version waiting for regulatory clearance, or it could mean the existing feature has a more advanced implementation tied to newer hardware.

The report says the feature remains under FDA review. That is the key bit here. It suggests Apple may have something it does not yet want to switch on publicly, either because it needs clearance or because it wants to launch it with the next Apple Watch generation.

For users, the obvious question is whether this means real blood pressure readings. Right now, it does not sound like that. The wording points to notifications rather than systolic and diastolic numbers, so this still looks more like pattern detection than cuff-style measurement.

Ultra 4 may be the bigger story

The same report links the health feature to Apple Watch Ultra 4, which is expected to bring a redesign and upgraded sensing hardware. Previous supply chain chatter has pointed to exterior changes and a new rear sensor arrangement, including a ring-like layout with more sensors.

That would make sense if Apple wants better signal quality from the underside of the watch. Blood pressure estimation is difficult from the wrist, especially if Apple wants to avoid a cuff. Better optical hardware could help Apple detect vascular patterns more reliably, even if it still stops short of giving full blood pressure values.

Still, the report does not clearly say whether older models will support it. That point needs caution. Apple may bring the feature to several models if the existing optical sensor can handle it, or it may reserve the improved version for new watches with updated hardware.

The blood glucose line needs caution

The report also mentions noninvasive blood glucose monitoring as Apple’s next stage after high blood pressure notifications. That sounds exciting, but it also needs a large pinch of salt.

Apple has worked on noninvasive glucose monitoring for years. The technical challenge remains huge because glucose measurement needs accuracy in a way that general wellness trends do not. A weak or inconsistent reading could create more problems than it solves.

So this should not be read as a sign that Apple Watch Ultra 4 will suddenly measure blood glucose. The safer reading is that Apple continues to work on it and that regulatory approval would be needed before anything public appears.

Useful, but not the full answer yet

The frustration is that Apple Watch blood pressure rumours have been around for years. Many people want actual readings, not another alert that tells them to use a cuff. That is understandable, especially when cheaper wearables often claim to offer blood pressure numbers, even if the reliability can be questionable.

Apple tends to move slower in health because it usually wants regulatory cover and a defensible method. That can make the Watch feel behind rivals on spec sheets, but it also reduces the chance of pushing out a feature that creates false confidence.

The post Apple Watch blood pressure feature reportedly under FDA review appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.