This is not one of those comparisons where the two watches are pretending to be completely different things. They share the same general shape and everyday smartwatch focus, but Bip Max pushes the format bigger, while Bip 6 keeps things lighter and a bit more polished on the wrist.

So let’s get into the detail as to what separates these two devices. It’s worth noting that this article is based on leaked information about the upcoming device. We will update it when more info becomes available.

Bigger screen and brighter display

The display is the obvious starting point. Amazfit Bip Max is uses a 2.07 inch AMOLED, compared with the 1.97 inch AMOLED on the Bip 6. That does not sound like a huge jump, but on a square smartwatch it should be noticeable, especially for widgets, maps, workout stats and larger watch faces.

Resolution also moves up from 390 x 450 on the Bip 6 to 432 x 514 on the Bip Max. Peak brightness climbs as well, from 2000 nits to 3000 nits. So the Max is not just larger, it should also be easier to read outdoors if the leaked figure holds up.

Both watches use tempered glass with an anti fingerprint coating, so this is not a case of the Max moving to a more premium glass material. The difference here is mostly about size, pixels and brightness. That fits the visual design too, as the Max looks like it has been built to make the screen the main selling point.

Bigger body and different controls

The size difference is plain to see. Bip Max measures 49.5 x 42.63 x 10.93 mm, while Bip 6 measures 46.3 x 40.2 x 10.45 mm. The Max is wider, taller and slightly thicker. Hence the name Max!

Bip Max weighs 52.6g with the strap, while Bip 6 weighs 44g. So yes, the Max is heavier, but not by a lot. What you will probably feel more is the larger case, because the Max simply takes up more space on the wrist.

The controls also split the two devices visually. Bip Max has the more obvious crown on the right side, paired with a flat button below it. Bip 6 uses two flatter side buttons instead, which gives it a more basic control system.

More storage for music and maps

Storage is another big gap between the two. Bip Max comes with 4GB, while Bip 6 has 512MB, with around 100MB available for files. That is a sizeable difference for a budget smartwatch.

The extra space on Bip Max can be used for maps as well as music, which gives the watch a bit more standalone appeal. It also makes the Max feel less like a basic fitness watch and more like a low cost smartwatch with some proper offline capability.

Bip 6 still covers the essentials, but its available file storage is much more limited. For users who do not care about storing anything on the watch, that may not be a big issue. But if offline content is part of the appeal, the leaked Max spec has the clear advantage.

Battery life gets a clear bump

Battery capacity also moves up sharply. Bip Max has a 540 mAh battery, while Bip 6 has a 340 mAh battery. That is a large increase and it helps explain the bigger case.

Typical battery life is quoted at up to 20 days for Bip Max, compared with up to 14 days for Bip 6. As always, real use will depend on brightness, workouts, Bluetooth calling, health tracking and always on display settings. But on paper, the Max has more headroom.

WiFi joins the spec sheet

Connectivity is another area where the Max steps ahead. It adds WiFi and uses Bluetooth 5.3, while Bip 6 has Bluetooth 5.2 and no WiFi. That helps with faster syncing, updates and transferring files.

Both watches still include a microphone and speaker, so Bluetooth calling is present on both. NFC is absent from both spec sheets, so there is no difference there. The Max gets the advantage mainly through WiFi and the newer Bluetooth version.

The sensor is pretty much the same. Both include the BioTracker PPG biometric sensor with 5PD and 2LED, along with acceleration, gyroscope, ambient light and geomagnetic sensors. So this is not a sensor upgrade story.

Our takeaway

Amazfit Bip Max is expected to come in at $100, while Bip 6 sits at $80. So this is not a huge price gap, but the two watches do start to make sense for slightly different people.

Bip Max is the one to go for if you want the larger screen, longer battery life, WiFi and more room for music and maps. It is also the bigger watch on the wrist, so that extra hardware comes with a chunkier feel.

Bip 6 is the neater option. It costs less, weighs less and keeps the same basic Bip idea in a smaller body. If you do not care about the bigger display or extra storage, that $80 model still looks like the easier everyday pick.

Tech specs comparison

The post Amazfit Bip Max vs Bip 6: Where the newer model moves ahead appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

That is good news if you use an Amazfit watch for structured training but prefer Runalyze for deeper analysis. Amazfit devices have become much more capable in recent years, but external platform support still plays a big role for runners and cyclists who want to keep their training history in one place.

What the new connection does

The integration lets users connect their Zepp Health account directly to Runalyze. After that, new activities such as running and cycling can sync automatically. Sleep data and heart rate variability also come across, which makes this more useful than a simple workout export.

That broader data mix is the main point here. Runalyze already gives users detailed tools for analysing load, fitness trends and recovery. Adding sleep and HRV from Amazfit devices gives those charts more context, especially during heavier training blocks or periods when recovery starts to drift.

This also makes the setup much cleaner. Until now, Amazfit users who wanted their data in Runalyze often had to rely on a chain of services. One common workaround involved syncing to Intervals.icu, exporting to Dropbox and then using RunGap to move the file onwards. It worked, but it was clunky and not entirely free.

The direct connection removes that friction. It also helps users avoid using other platforms as a middle layer. For people who care about clean training records, that is probably the biggest practical benefit.

To link the two accounts simply go to the Configuration section in Runalize. Then click on Services and choose Amazfit. This link will take you directly to that page. Then it’s a matter of signing into your Zepp Health account and giving Runalize the necessary permissions.

Historical import is not ready yet

There is one catch worth mentioning. The connection currently works only for new data after setup. Existing activities, sleep records and HRV history from Zepp Health do not come across yet.

Runalyze says historical import is already in development and will be available soon. Once that arrives, users should be able to bring older Amazfit data into the same Runalyze account, instead of only building the record from today onwards.

For now, it makes sense to connect early if you plan to use the feature. That way, fresh data starts flowing immediately and the backfill can fill the older gaps later.

Our takeaway

This is a small software addition, but it improves the practical value of Amazfit watches for serious training. The hardware side has moved on quickly, with better battery life, stronger health tracking and more advanced sports features across recent models.

The platform side still counts, though. A good watch becomes more useful when the data can leave the companion app cleanly and land in tools people already use. Runalyze is one of those tools for runners who want more than a basic weekly summary.

That makes this a sensible integration rather than a headline grabbing one. It gives Amazfit users a cleaner workflow, gives Runalyze access to more complete recovery data and removes a workaround that many people only tolerated because there was no better option.

This article originally appeared on Gadgets & Wearables, the first media outlet to report the story.

The post Amazfit and Runalyze now connect directly for training data appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

Smart rings are where most of the heat is

The most recent development is the one we covered last week. Just like Samsung previously, Zepp Health has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Oura in Texas. The company is claiming the Oura Ring Gen 3, Oura Ring Gen 4 and the Oura app use technology covered by six of its patents. The case focuses on the software and sensor systems behind activity tracking, sleep analysis and health scoring.

That makes the smart ring fight more interesting. Zepp Health is not just defending itself against Oura’s earlier action. It is now going after Oura directly.

Oura, on the other hand, had already filed an ITC complaint against Samsung, Reebok, Zepp Health and Nexxbase over smart wearable devices. That investigation was opened in December after Oura accused those companies of importing and selling devices that infringe its patents. It is one of the higher stakes routes because ITC cases can lead to import restrictions if a company wins.

But Oura has also trimmed part of that case. On April 28th, the ITC said it would not review an earlier decision allowing Oura to withdraw 22 patent claims. The withdrawn claims and the entire ’159 patent are now out of the investigation. That does not mean Oura has lost the case. It means the case has become narrower before the next heavier stages.

WHOOP is trying to protect the screenless band look

WHOOP’s Polar case has also moved forward. The recent update is that Polar has now formally answered WHOOP’s complaint, after earlier exploring a motion to dismiss.

That dismissal route did not go anywhere. Polar first tried to file a motion to dismiss, but the court required a pre-motion conference. After that conference in March, Polar withdrew its request to file a renewed dismissal motion. The court then told Polar to respond, and Polar filed its answer on April 10th.

So the case is now on the normal litigation track. WHOOP still argues that Polar Loop copies the look of its screenless tracker, including the faceless design, woven band, thin metallic side accents and clasp style. Polar denies the claims.

This is not about sensors or recovery algorithms. It is about trade dress, basically whether WHOOP can protect the look of a screenless band. That could become important if more brands try to make health trackers that do not look like watches.

WHOOP also has a separate case against Bevel in Delaware. The recent activity there looks procedural, mostly attorney appearances and early filings, so there is less to say for now. But taken together, the message is pretty clear. WHOOP is watching the screenless band space closely and is willing to go after rivals it thinks are getting too close.

Garmin and Suunto are fighting over watch tech

Sports watches are not staying out of the courtroom either. Suunto sued Garmin last year over several patents, including claims tied to golf shot detection, respiration tracking from optical heart rate data and watch design elements. Garmin has since responded with its own counterclaims.

Garmin’s counterattack makes the case more than a one way patent complaint. The counterclaims pull in technology around GPS antenna design, training and recovery metrics and flashlight hardware.

This case will probably move slowly. Patent disputes usually do. The useful point for buyers is that there is no immediate reason to expect Garmin or Suunto watches to disappear from shelves because of this.

Why this is happening now

The wearable market has matured. That is the short version. Early on, everyone raced to prove that wrist based health tracking, smart rings and recovery metrics could find an audience. Now the big product categories are clearer, so companies are trying to protect the territory they helped define.

Smart rings show this most clearly. Oura helped make the category mainstream. But other companies have moved in with cheaper or more specialised alternatives. Once that happens, patents become part of the competitive playbook. The same thing is now happening around screenless bands, where WHOOP wants to stop rivals from getting too close to its visual identity.

There is also a commercial reason. Hardware margins can get squeezed quickly. Subscriptions, health scoring systems and recovery insights are harder to differentiate than they used to be. If a company believes its rivals are copying core ideas, the courtroom becomes another way to slow them down.

The post Wearable lawsuit recap as Oura, WHOOP and Garmin cases move ahead appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The WHOOP message recently spotted uses the usual subscription language. It says a membership renewal did not complete and points the user toward updating billing information. At a quick glance, it looks like the kind of admin email many people would deal with without thinking too much about it.

The issue is the sender address. A report on Reddit points to the email coming from a Gmail account rather than a WHOOP address. That alone should make you stop before tapping anything, especially when payment information is involved.

Wearable users are becoming a target

This is not the first time a major wearable brand has been used as bait in a phishing attempt. For example, we previously covered Garmin users receiving emails that tried to push them into handing over account or payment details. The pattern is much the same here, with a recognisable brand name used to make a fake message feel normal.

That is what makes these emails effective. Most people expect occasional billing notices from subscription services. WHOOP has memberships, Garmin has accounts and services, Oura has subscriptions and Fitbit has Premium. That gives scammers an easy hook.

The emails do not need to look dramatic. In fact, the more boring they look, the better they work. A routine billing problem feels believable because expired cards and failed renewals happen all the time.

The safest route is through the app

The easiest way to avoid this kind of trap is not to use billing links in emails. Open the WHOOP app directly or go to the official website by typing the address yourself. Then check the account from there.

This applies even when the email looks clean. A visible link can say one thing while the actual destination points somewhere else. On a phone, that is easy to miss because people often tap before checking the full address.

The sender address remains the first thing to inspect. A billing message from WHOOP should come from a WHOOP controlled domain. A random address should not be trusted with account or payment updates.

A few extra steps worth taking

If there is still any doubt, contact WHOOP directly through the support details on its official site rather than replying to the email. That keeps the conversation away from the suspicious message and gives you a cleaner way to confirm whether the account alert is real.

The same goes for links. Even if part of the email looks legitimate, avoid clicking through from the message once something feels off. A fake email only needs one believable button or link to do its job.

Once you have decided the message is suspicious, delete it. That sounds basic, but it removes the chance of coming back to it later when you are rushed and clicking the wrong thing by habit.

It is also worth checking whether the claim actually fits your account. A renewal warning should match your real renewal timing, membership status and recent payment activity. If those details do not line up, the email has already failed the smell test.

Two-factor authentication is another useful layer if the account supports it. It will not stop fake emails from arriving, but it can make stolen login details less useful if they ever end up on the wrong page.

The post Fake WHOOP renewal email shows why sender checks are vital appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

A familiar big screen formula

Redmi Watch 6 sticks with a large 2.07 inch AMOLED display, but Xiaomi now claims up to 2000 nits peak brightness. The Redmi Watch 5 already had one of the better screens in this price range, with a sharp, vibrant panel that made menus, widgets and workout data easy to read. The new brightness figure should make outdoor visibility stronger, assuming real world performance lines up with the spec sheet.

The case now measures 46.45 x 40.03 x 9.94mm and weighs 31 grams without the strap. That makes it slimmer and lighter than the Redmi Watch 5, although this is still a large rectangular watch.

Xiaomi has kept the aluminium alloy frame and added a stainless steel crown plus a second physical button. The later should make it a little easier to use during workouts.

Battery life remains the safe bet

Battery life was one of the strongest parts of my Redmi Watch 5 review. It used the same 550mAh battery, and during my two week test I did not need to charge it once. That was impressive for a watch with such a large AMOLED display.

Redmi Watch 6 keeps the 550mAh capacity, with Xiaomi claiming up to 24 days in light use, 12 days in typical use and 7 days in heavy use. Those figures will depend on settings, GPS use and the always on display, but the Watch 5 gives some confidence that Xiaomi’s battery claims are not just decoration.

NFC is the upgrade to watch

The most interesting part is the separate Redmi Watch 6 NFC model. Xiaomi says it supports contactless payments through Mastercard and Visa, although this will depend on the region and supported banks.

That stood out because NFC was one of the gaps in my Redmi Watch 5 review. The Watch 5 had a great screen, strong battery life, Bluetooth calling, local music storage and built in GNSS, but the lack of wrist payments made it feel slightly less complete as an everyday smartwatch. The NFC version of Redmi Watch 6 changes that, at least in markets where support is active.

Fitness tracking should feel familiar

Redmi Watch 6 supports more than 150 sports modes and built in satellite positioning through GPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeiDou and QZSS. Xiaomi also mentions a dual L1 antenna setup that chooses the stronger signal depending on how the watch is worn.

The Watch 5 performed surprisingly well in my testing, including GPS runs in Central London where tall buildings can make tracking messy. Heart rate also improved once I swapped to a tighter strap, bringing the readings much closer to my Garmin comparison setup. That is worth remembering here, because fit still plays a big role in optical heart rate accuracy.

The new model also includes all day heart rate, blood oxygen, stress and sleep tracking, plus 5ATM water resistance. Xiaomi says heart rate tracking now works while swimming, which gives the watch a slightly broader fitness profile.

Early takeaway

Redmi Watch 6 looks like a tidy follow up. Xiaomi has kept the parts that worked on the Watch 5, including the big AMOLED screen, strong battery life, built in GNSS and practical smart features. The brighter display, slimmer case, extra button and NFC option make it feel better rounded.

The NFC model is the one I would watch most closely. If Xiaomi gets pricing and regional payment support right, Redmi Watch 6 could be one of the more interesting budget smartwatch launches of the year.

The post Xiaomi brings Redmi Watch 6 global with one key Watch 5 gap fixed appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

A bigger Cheetah 2 model appears likely

The Cheetah line has always leaned into running, but the newer information suggests Zepp Health may be preparing something with a broader trail and outdoor angle. The details point to a circular watch with a 1.5 inch AMOLED display, 480 x 480 resolution and sapphire glass, which would put it above the 1.32 inch display found on the Cheetah 2 Pro.

That larger screen would make sense for maps, navigation and longer outdoor sessions. The information also points to improved offline maps with faster loading and rendering, which would fit the larger display well.

The design also appears to stick with the four button layout used on the Cheetah 2 Pro. That suggests Zepp Health may not be changing the basic control setup, but instead scaling the concept into a more premium outdoor form. The case styling looks tougher as well, with more prominent bezel detailing and a less minimal feel.

The build details need a bit of caution. The information points to titanium being used in the case construction, while there’s also mention of plastic. So this should not be read as a full titanium case unless Zepp Health confirms it.

The battery could be the real clue

Another interesting part is the battery figure. The information we have seen points to a 780mAh battery, which is a sizeable jump from the 540mAh unit in the Cheetah 2 Pro. That would also line up with a claimed battery life of up to 30 days in normal use and up to 70 hours with GPS.

Those figures would move this model into a different conversation. The Cheetah 2 Pro is already well equipped for serious runners, but a larger battery would make the next variant more appealing for trail runs, long hikes and multi day use away from a charger.

Storage may also be getting a bump. The details point to 64GB, compared with 32GB on the Cheetah 2 Pro. That could help with offline maps, music and future software features.

The flashlight also appears to carry over from the Cheetah 2 Pro, which already includes a dual-mode LED with white and red light, Boost and SOS modes. It keeps the practical outdoor angle intact, especially for early runs, late walks and outdoor use where a built-in light can be genuinely handy.

More than just a Cheetah 2 Pro with a bigger case

The Cheetah 2 Pro can remain the performance model, while this possible new version would likely sit above it for people who want more battery life and a more substantial build. It would be a logical move, especially as the line now overlaps more with hiking and navigation than the original Cheetah watches did.

Zepp Health has been moving quickly with its recent watch launches. Cheetah 2 Pro arrived with a stronger build and more serious navigation features than the older Cheetah line, and there should be more to come soon. We are also expecting a new addition to the Bip line, along with an Amazfit HYROX watch, so the next few weeks could be busy for the company.

The post A more premium Amazfit Cheetah 2 variant looks to be on the way appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

This is the first G-LIDE model with an optical heart rate sensor, and it connects two strands of Casio’s lineup that have been running in parallel. The GBX-100 brought the surf features and MIP display. The DW-H5600 brought heart rate and Polar-backed training metrics. The GBX-H5600 is where those two meet.

A G-LIDE that now works off the beach

Up to now, G-LIDE has been very specific in what it does well. Tide graphs, moon data and ocean timing have always been the focus, with only light activity tracking in the background. That made sense for its audience, but it also limited how often the watch made it onto the wrist outside of surf sessions.

The GBX-H5600 changes that. It tracks heart rate, steps and workouts, and uses smartphone GPS to tighten up distance data. More importantly, it adds a layer of analysis that was missing before. Polar handles that side, with metrics like Running Index, Cardio Load, Energy Used and Nightly Recharge, along with sleep tracking and recovery insights.

That does not turn it into a full sports watch, but it does make the data more useful. You are not just logging activity anymore, you are getting context around effort and recovery. For a G-SHOCK, that is a noticeable shift.

Same square look, lighter feel

On the hardware side, Casio keeps things familiar. The case comes in at 51.1 by 44.5 by 17.3 millimetres and weighs 47 grams, which is lighter than earlier heart rate equipped squares. That matters because these watches are often worn all day, not just during workouts.

The Memory in Pixel display is also the right call here. It keeps visibility strong outdoors and fits the digital G-SHOCK identity much better than a brighter but more power-hungry screen would. You still get shock resistance, 20 bar water resistance and bio-based resin used across the case, bezel and band.

Battery trade-offs are still there

Casio goes with USB charging supported by solar assist. Solar helps keep the time display running when the battery is low, but the health tracking and connected features rely on regular charging. That is the same compromise seen on the DW-H5600.

Battery life lands at around 35 hours with activity tracking and about a month in basic watch mode with heart rate turned off. It is not aiming to compete with full solar G-SHOCKs here, but it does enough to balance features with battery size.

Our takeaway

Casio is clearly leaning into this whole Polar powered thing. Up to now, this was mostly sitting in watches like the DW-H5600 and the more sports focused GBD-H2000. Now that same layer is turning up in a G-LIDE, which is not where you would have expected it a year ago.

That is what makes this interesting. Casio is not trying to build its own big fitness platform, it is just plugging in Polar and dropping those insights into different watches. So now you have a surf watch that can actually tell you something useful about your training and recovery, not just show you tides and moon phases.

At the same time, they are not overdoing it. This is not suddenly trying to be a Garmin. There is no deep training ecosystem or standalone GPS. It just sits in that middle space, where you get enough data to be useful, but it still feels like a proper G-SHOCK you can wear anywhere without thinking about it.

The post G-SHOCK GBX-H5600 adds Polar metrics to Casio’s surf watch formula appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

A couple of weeks ago, we wrote about a HYROX Warsaw promo video from Amazfit Poland that appeared to show an unannounced Balance-style watch. At the time, the design looked close to the Balance 2, but the case architecture was different enough to raise questions.

A few days ago Zepp Health posted this teaser on their social media channels.

The new regulatory material now adds more detail to that earlier sighting and the teaser. We are, however, missing the final retail name.

The HYROX watch now looks like A2553

The watch shown in the HYROX Warsaw clip had a familiar round display and general Balance-like proportions, but the surrounding case did not look like the standard Balance 2. It had a more angular frame, more pronounced lugs, screw-like details around the top and bottom and a more rugged case-to-strap transition.

That is where today’s FCC filing gets interesting. The drawing for Amazfit model A2553 shows a large round watch sitting inside an angular outer structure, with the same kind of reinforced shape seen in the HYROX image. Looking through both side by side, to us this looks like the same device.

The HYROX image also shows a rotating crown at the upper right. The filing drawing is more technical and does not read like a consumer render, so it does not clearly explain the controls. But the overall case geometry lines up well enough to connect the two.

The filing gives us proper hardware clues

The documents identify the device as a production unit. So this does not look like an early concept floating around inside a marketing department. The confidentiality clause on the full FCC filing runs out in six months, so we should see the watch before then.

A2553 has a 780mAh cell, which sits above the 700mAh battery in the T-Rex 3 but below the 870mAh one in the T-Rex Ultra 2. So this is not small-watch territory. It looks more like a bigger premium fitness watch, which fits the chunky HYROX design we saw earlier. Hence the emphasis on “BIG” in the teaser image.

Connectivity includes Bluetooth and 2.4GHz Wi-Fi. The antenna documentation also covers receiver ranges around 1170MHz to 1180MHz and 1570MHz to 1580MHz, which points towards dual-band GNSS support. The filing does not spell out the final positioning feature set, so that should be treated as a strong hardware clue rather than a finished product claim.

The size points to something above a standard Balance

The drawing gives us a few useful size clues. The watch appears to have a 45mm display, while the widest measured span across the outer case structure is 51.73mm. That makes sense when you look back at the HYROX pic, where the device looked broader and more built-up than the regular Balance 2.

It’s worth noting that these are mechanical or antenna-related references rather than retail case dimensions. The safer takeaway is that this is a large round watch with a wider angular shell around it.

This also explains why the earlier HYROX watch looked slightly odd at first glance. It was not just a Balance 2 with a different watch face. The case itself appears to be different, with a more protective outer frame and a more engineered strap connection.

The retail name is still the missing piece

The filing does not give us the final marketing name, so that part remains open. But the HYROX tie-in may be the clue.

Zepp Health has been leaning into HYROX as a fitness partnership and a more rugged Balance-style edition would fit that direction. The watch could end up as a special edition, a Pro-style variant or a fitness-focused version of Balance 2 with different casing and hardware tweaks. Or perhaps even a part of the T-Rex range.

The earlier HYROX Warsaw pic now looks less like a one-off promo image and more like an early public glimpse of real hardware. With the company teaser and now FCC material adding battery, connectivity, GNSS and size clues, we have a clearer picture of what Zepp Health has been preparing.

This article originally appeared on Gadgets & Wearables, the first media outlet to report the story.

Source: FCC

The post Amazfit HYROX watch gets clearer in new regulatory filing appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

The timing makes sense. Early firmware updates often shape how a device feels out of the box, and this one leans heavily into running features. That lines up with how Amazfit positions the Cheetah line, and it gives a clearer idea of what the watch is trying to be from day one.

A strong focus on structured training

The biggest additions sit around guided training. Hybrid Training is now part of the package, offering structured plans aimed at improving performance while managing injury risk and long term consistency.

Lactate threshold also makes an appearance, along with testing tools. That shifts the watch further into performance territory. This is a feature that debuted with Active 3 Premium, but has since rolled out to a bunch of other devices.

Official marathon plans are included as well, and there is support for third party platforms like TrainingPeaks. That opens the door to more serious training setups.

The addition of a Training Calendar ties this together. It shows upcoming workouts in a more organised way, which sounds simple but makes a big difference when you are following a schedule over several weeks.

Tools that go beyond basic tracking

A few smaller additions fill in the gaps around daily training. Equivalent Pace is now available, adjusting uphill efforts into a flat ground equivalent. It helps make sense of hilly runs without manually interpreting splits.

Race Time Prediction also joins the list. It estimates finishing times for different distances based on recent performance. These predictions are common across higher end sports watches, so it is good to see Zepp Health getting in on the fun.

Equipment Management is another addition that may not get much attention at first, but it can be useful over time. Tracking mileage on shoes and gear helps with rotation and replacement for runners.

Navigation and mapping improvements

The update also touches route planning and navigation. Off course alerts are said to be more sensitive, and turn notifications come through more quickly. That should make following routes feel a bit more reliable, particularly in urban environments or complex trails.

Map visuals get an upgrade as well, with richer terrain detail and improved contour accuracy. It is not a complete overhaul, but it points to incremental improvements that matter during actual use rather than on a spec sheet.

Other changes

Outside of sports features, the default screen on time is extended to 15 seconds. This reduces the need to constantly wake the display during workouts or general use.

Sleep tracking has been refined through algorithm changes.

Local music and podcast support is now available globally, removing regional limitations that were present before. That makes the feature more consistent regardless of where the watch is used.

There is also a mention of Launcher 2.0 improvements, aimed at making navigation smoother. Combined with general bug fixes and performance tweaks, the update should help the watch feel more stable overall.

Source: Amazfit Discord channel

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Amazfit Cheetah 2 Pro gets first update as units start shipping appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.

That battery figure is what makes this launch stand out. For a mainstream smartwatch, 35 days is a big claim, and it suggests Honor is pushing this model heavily around endurance. The official pre-order poster also shows a familiar round design, so the focus looks to be more on what is happening under the hood than a dramatic visual revamp.

Battery life takes centre stage

Battery life has become one of the easiest ways for smartwatch brands to separate themselves, especially as many full-featured watches still need charging every few days. Honor appears to be going in the opposite direction with the Watch 6 Plus.

The company says the watch can last up to 35 days on a charge. It has not yet explained what usage conditions apply to that number, so it is worth being cautious. These figures often depend on light use, reduced notifications or limited GPS activity. Still, even with that usual fine print, the number is high enough to grab attention.

It may also be the strongest battery claim Honor has made for one of its smartwatches so far. Earlier reports had already hinted that this model would carry the brand’s biggest smartwatch battery pack yet, although the actual battery capacity is still unknown.

That creates an interesting position for the Watch 6 Plus. Instead of chasing the thinnest design or the brightest display headline, Honor seems to be putting battery life right at the front of the pitch.

Sports features are getting more attention

The teaser points to advanced running exercises. Which suggests Honor wants this watch to appeal to more serious fitness users rather than only casual smartwatch buyers.

There is also a dedicated badminton mode mentioned in the material. Regional popularity often shapes these choices, and badminton remains a major activity category across Asian markets.

Earlier leak reports also mentioned broader upgrades to fitness tracking, with smarter workout data and expanded sports modes expected. Those details are still not fully confirmed, but the running focus now looks official enough to take seriously.

Heart health features are being teased

Honor is also talking about professional heart health care and expert support. The wording is still vague, so there is not much point in stretching that into firm conclusions yet.

Earlier leaks suggested possibilities such as continuous blood pressure monitoring and early cardiac warning alerts, but those features have not been directly confirmed by the official teaser. For now, the safer reading is that Honor is preparing stronger health monitoring tools, but the exact feature list still needs to be revealed.

What we still do not know

There is still no official launch date, although earlier reports point to a May release window. Pricing is also still under wraps, and that matters just as much as the battery claim. Honor usually plays in the more affordable end of the smartwatch market, so this one is unlikely to be too hard on your wallet.

There are also gaps around display specs, materials, GPS setup, charging speed and battery size. Those details usually decide whether a watch is competing with entry-level models or aiming much higher.

For now, Honor has done enough to make people pay attention. A 35-day claim is not the kind of number that gets ignored, especially when paired with clearer fitness ambitions.

Via HuaweiCentral

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter! Check out our YouTube channel.

And of course, you can follow Gadgets & Wearables on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

The post Honor Watch 6 Plus teases 35 day battery and new sports features appeared first on Gadgets & Wearables.