Amazfit Bip 5 vs GTS 4

Amazfit Bip 5 vs GTS 4 & 4 Mini: comparison feature

Launched between July and August 2023, the Amazfit Bip 5, GTS 4, and GTS 4 Mini cater to a broad spectrum of users, from the budget-conscious to the feature-savvy. Each model, while sharing the Amazfit lineage, is distinct in its appeal and functionality. The Bip 5 appeals to those seeking essential features without the frills. In contrast, the GTS 4 and GTS 4 Mini, launched slightly earlier, target users who desire a blend of advanced functionality and compact design, respectively.

Essential readingTop fitness trackers and health gadgets

This comparison piece delves into the nuances that set these models apart, offering insights into their suitability for different types of users. Read on to find out how these three devices stack up.

Key takeaways

The Amazfit Bip 5, GTS 4, and GTS 4 Mini offer varied experiences tailored to different user needs and budgets. The Bip 5 is a large-display packing, budget-friendly option for basic fitness tracking. The GTS 4 is a premium device for those seeking advanced features, while the GTS 4 Mini provides a compact and affordable solution for everyday use.

View on Amazfit; View on Amazon (Bip 5, GTS 4, GTS 4 Mini).

Jump to

Technical specs
Bottom line

Amazfit Bip 5 vs GTS 4 & Mini: Hardware

Design & display

The Amazfit Bip 5, GTS 4, and GTS 4 Mini all share a square shape, but each presents unique nuances in their build. The Bip 5 features a plastic body paired with a silicone strap, offering a lightweight and comfortable fit. Its design is simple yet functional, appealing to users who prefer a no-frills, efficient look.

The GTS 4, on the other hand, elevates the design with an aluminum alloy middle frame and a high-gloss sprayed PC bottom shell. Such a combination gives it a more premium feel. This model is ideal for users who seek a blend of elegance and durability in their wearable tech. The GTS 4 Mini, while maintaining the square shape, opts for a combination of metal and polymer materials along with a soft silicone strap, providing a balance between sturdiness and comfort.

All three models feature a single physical button, maintaining a minimalist approach to design. This single-button design ensures ease of use, allowing users to interact with the device without the clutter of multiple buttons.

Display, colour options, water-resistance

The display is a critical aspect of these smartwatches. The Bip 5 boasts a TFT-LCD display with 2.5D glass and an anti-fingerprint coating, ensuring clarity and reduced smudges. The GTS 4 and GTS 4 Mini both feature AMOLED displays, known for their vibrant colors and deeper blacks. The AMOLED technology in these models enhances the user experience with better contrast and visibility, especially in bright outdoor environments.

Color options add a personal touch to wearable devices. The Bip 5 is available in Soft Black, Cream White, and Pastel Pink. The GTS 4 offers a broader palette with Infinite Black, Misty White, Autumn Brown, and Rosebud Pink, catering to a variety of tastes. The GTS 4 Mini comes in Midnight Black, Flamingo Pink, Mint Blue, and Moonlight White, providing vibrant and trendy options.

Water resistance is a key feature for users who engage in water-related activities or simply want protection against the elements. The Bip 5 has an IP68 rating. This makes it suitable for everyday wear and capable of withstanding dust and water splashes. The other two boast a higher water resistance with a 5 ATM rating, making them suitable for swimming.

Sensor technology

We get to more differences when it come to technology and connectivity. The Amazfit Bip 5 is equipped with an accelerometer, gyro, and a heart rate sensor (BioTracker PPG), providing essential health and fitness tracking. The GTS 4 advances this with the BioTracker 4.0 PPG. This is coupled with an accelerometer, gyroscope, geomagnetic sensor, barometer, and ambient light sensor, offering a more comprehensive health and environmental awareness. The GTS 4 Mini, while compact, includes the BioTracke 3.0 PPG biometric sensor, accelerometer, geomagnetic sensor, ambient light brightness senso.

GPS connectivity is a strong point for all three models, with each supporting multiple satellite positioning systems for accurate location tracking. The GTS 4 stands out with its dual-band and 6 satellite positioning systems, offering enhanced accuracy. In terms of additional features, the GTS 4 is also the only model among the three that offers music storage capability, with a maximum storage space of 2.3GB, enough for a significant number of MP3 songs. However, NFC is not available on any of these models, which might be a consideration for users looking for contactless payment options.

Battery life

As far as battery life, the Bip 5 impresses with up to 10 days of juice under typical usage. This can extend to 26 days in battery saver mode. The GTS 4, with the same 300 mAh battery capacity, provides 8 days of battery life in normal mode. This stretches to 16 days in a limited functionality mode, suitable for users who need a balance between performance and longevity. The GTS 4 Mini stands out with its extended battery life. It conjures up to 15 days in normal mode and an impressive 45 days in battery saver mode.

Amazfit Bip 5 vs GTS 4 & Mini: Technical specs

Here’s a detailed tech specs comparison table for the trio of devices:

Amazfit Bip 5
Amazfit GTS 4
Amazfit GTS 4 Mini
Release Date
August 2023
October 2022
July 2022
Case Material
Plastic body, silicone strap
Aluminum alloy frame, PC bottom shell
Metal, polymer material, silicone strap
Physical Buttons
Square, curved
45.94 x 38.09 x 11.2 mm
42.7 x 36.5 x 9.9 mm
Display Type
TFT-LCD (2.5D glass, anti-fingerprint)
320 × 380 pixels
390 x 450 pixels
384 x 336 pixels
Screen Size
1.91 inches
1.75 inches
1.65 inches
Weight (w/o Strap)
26 grams
24 grams
31.2 grams (with strap)
Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, blood oxygen
BioTracker 4.0 PPG, accelerometer, gyroscope, geomagnetic sensor, barometer, ambient light sensor
BioTracker™ 3.0 PPG, accelerometer, geomagnetic sensor, ambient light sensor, GPS, NFC
Dual-band, 6 satellite systems
Built-in Speaker
Music Storage
Yes (2.3GB, 270-470 MP3 songs)
WLAN 2.4GHz, Bluetooth 5.0 & BLE
Battery Type
300 mAh
300 mAh
270 mAh
Battery Life
Up to 10 days (typical), 26 days (saver)
8 days (normal), 16 days (limited), 16 hours (GPS)
15 days (normal), 45 days (saver), 21 hours (GPS)
Operating System
Zepp OS 2.+
Zepp OS 2.+
Zepp OS 2.+
Soft Black, Cream White, Pastel Pink
Infinite Black, Misty White, Autumn Brown, Rosebud Pink
Midnight Black, Flamingo Pink, Mint Blue, Moonlight White
Typical RRP

Amazfit Bip 5 vs GTS 4 & Mini: Features

The Bip 5, with its robust build and basic yet efficient health tracking features, is ideal for those seeking a reliable and budget-friendly fitness companion. It’s particularly suited for everyday users who need essential fitness tracking without the complexity of more advanced features. The device’s heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and standard workout modes, making it a solid choice for everyday health management. Plus you get the large display which makes it easy to view all your data.

The GTS 4, on the other hand, is designed for those a bit more serious about their athletic pursuits. With its BioTracker PPG 4.0 sensor, it provides more detailed insights into heart rate, blood oxygen levels, and stress. Plus it has a wider range of sports modes and elevation tracking thanks to a barometric altimeter and enhanced GPS.

The GTS 4 Mini, being compact and budget-friendly, is targeted towards users who want the core functionalities of a smartwatch and fitness tracker without the bulk or the price tag of more premium models. It has the slightly less advanced with the BioTracker PPG 3.0 sensor. Nevertheless, it still covers essential health metrics and supports a variety of sports modes.

Smartwatch Features

As for smartwatch-type features, the Bip 5 and GTS 4 Mini keep it basic. They come with notification support, weather updates, and music controls. The GTS 4, however, steps up with additional features. This includes onboard music storage, allowing users to store and play music directly from the watch. The model also offers more in terms of customization and smart integrations.

Amazfit Bip 5 vs GTS 4 & Mini: Price

Price-wise, the Amazfit Bip 5 is the most affordable, typically retailing around $90. This makes it an excellent value-for-money option for those who need basic functionality without a hefty price tag. The GTS 4 Mini, priced at about $120, offers a middle ground, providing a balance of features and affordability. The GTS 4 comes with a higher price tag of around $200. This is justified by its advanced sensors, superior build quality, and enhanced smartwatch capabilities.

Amazfit Bip 5 vs GTS 4 & Mini: Final thoughts

The Amazfit Bip 5, GTS 4, and GTS 4 Mini each stand out in their own right, offering a spectrum of features that cater to a diverse range of users. The Bip 5, with its affordable price tag of around $70, is an excellent entry-level option for those seeking basic fitness and health tracking in a durable package. Its simplicity, large display and robust battery life make it a practical choice for everyday wear.

The GTS 4, priced at about $200, is the premium choice in this lineup, equipped with advanced health sensors, superior build quality, and enhanced smartwatch features like onboard music storage. It’s tailored for those who demand more from their wearable tech in terms of functionality and style. The GTS 4 Mini, striking a balance at $120, offers a compact and budget-friendly alternative, retaining essential health and fitness features suitable for casual users and those who prefer a less bulky smartwatch.

View on Amazfit; View on Amazon (Bip 5, GTS 4, GTS 4 Mini).

You may also be interested in:

Amazfit Balance vs GTR 4
Amazfit T-Rex 2 vs Active Edge
Amazfit Balance vs Cheetah Pro
Amazfit Cheetah Pro vs GTR 4
Amazfit Active vs Active Edge

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

Marko Maslakovic

Marko founded Gadgets & Wearables in 2014, having worked for more than 15 years in the City of London’s financial district. Since then, he has led the company’s charge to become a leading information source on health and fitness gadgets and wearables.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.