Garmin Lily 2 vs Vivomove Trend

Garmin Lily 2 vs Vivomove Trend: here are all the differences

As CES opens its doors for yet another year, Garmin has announced the female-centric Lily 2 smartwatch. The device offers some modest upgrades over its predecessor. Here we pit it versus the Garmin Vivomove Trend, launched back in February 2023.

Essential readingTop fitness trackers and health gadgets

These two smartwatches have lots of similarities. But there are also a few important things then set them apart. Keep reading to learn what they are.

Key takeaways

The Garmin Lily 2 and Vivomove Trend both excel in combining style with functionality, offering distinct experiences tailored to their target audiences. The Lily 2, with its elegant design and upgraded health sensors, is ideal for those who prioritize a sophisticated look and essential health tracking. The Vivomove Trend comes in a larger case size, and it has additional features like wireless charging, barometer for counting floors climbed and ANT+ connectivity. Price-wise, the Lily 2 is a more affordable option, while the Vivomove Trend offers additional features for a slightly higher cost.

View on Garmin; View on Amazon (Vivomove Trend, Lily 2).

Jump to

Technical specs
Bottom line

Garmin Lily 2 vs Vivomove Trend: Hardware

Design & display

Starting with their shape, both the Garmin Lily 2 and Vivomove Trend maintain a round form, a nod to the classic watch aesthetic. This choice reflects a commitment to a timeless design, appealing to users who favor traditional watch styles over more modern, angular smartwatches. The round shape also enhances wearability, making them suitable for a variety of wrist sizes and fashion choices.

In terms of build, the Garmin Lily 2 features an anodized aluminum case and bezel, with a lens made of Corning Gorilla Glass 3. This combination not only enhances durability but also adds a touch of sophistication to the watch’s overall appearance. The Vivomove Trend, on the other hand, opts for a fiber-reinforced polymer case with a stainless steel bezel and a domed chemically strengthened glass. This mix gives the Vivomove Trend a slightly more diverse material palette, potentially appealing to those who appreciate a blend of traditional and modern materials in their wearables.

Garmin Lily 2
Garmin Lily 2

Both models lack physical buttons, relying on touchscreen interfaces for navigation. This design choice contributes to a sleeker, more streamlined look, emphasizing the minimalist aesthetic that is a hallmark of both series.

Display, colour options, water-resistance

When it comes to the display, the Garmin Lily 2 uses a Liquid Crystal TFT LCD with 16-level grayscale, which, while not as vibrant as a color display, offers clarity and legibility. The Vivomove Trend is fairly similar in terms of the visual experience.

Color options in both models offer a range of choices, with the Lily 2 introducing new patterns and colors that add a contemporary flair to the design. These options cater to personal style preferences, allowing users to choose a look that best suits their individual taste. The Vivomove Trend also comes in various options, providing ample opportunity for personalization.

Garmin Vivomove Trend
Garmin Vivomove Trend

The Garmin Lily 2 further caters to diverse style preferences by offering distinct versions: the Classic and Sport. The Classic edition emphasizes elegance and sophistication, typically featuring premium materials and a more refined aesthetic. In contrast, the Sport version is designed with an active lifestyle in mind

In terms of water resistance, both models boast a rating of 5 ATM, ensuring durability and reliability in various environments, whether it’s during workouts, swimming, or daily wear. This feature underscores the practicality of both series, designed to withstand the rigors of everyday use while maintaining their aesthetic appeal.

Sensor technology

The Garmin Lily 2 comes with an accelerometer, the Gen 4 Elevate heart rate sensor, an SpO2 sensor, and an ambient light sensor. It does not include built-in GPS, relying instead on connected GPS via a paired smartphone. This design choice prioritizes compactness and aesthetic appeal. The Lily 2 also introduces NFC capability for contactless payments through Garmin Pay, a feature not present in its predecessor. However, it does not offer onboard music storage, focusing instead on essential smartwatch functionalities. Also, unlike Vivomove Trend, it does not have ANT+ compatibility. Which means you cannot pair it with external chest straps.

The Garmin Vivomove Trend, sharing some similarities, includes a Gen 3 optical heart rate monitor, a blood oxygen monitor, an accelerometer, a barometric altimeter, an NFC chip for contactless payments, and an ambient light sensor. The inclusion of a barometric altimeter is a notable addition not found in the Lily 2, providing elevation data which can be useful for certain fitness activities. Like the Lily 2, the Vivomove Trend lacks built-in GPS and relies on connected GPS. It also does not offer onboard music storage, aligning with the Lily 2 in focusing on core smartwatch and health tracking features.

The absence of built-in GPS in both models is a design decision likely aimed at maintaining a lower price point and extending battery life. Despite these limitations, both the Garmin Lily 2 and the Vivomove Trend offer a balanced blend of health tracking and smartwatch capabilities, packaged in designs that appeal to their target demographics.

Battery life

Both devices offer impressive endurance, but with a slight edge for the Vivomove Trend in certain modes. The Garmin Lily 2 maintains a consistent battery life of up to 5 days, a notable achievement considering its advanced Gen 4 Elevate sensor. This sensor enhances the watch’s functionality without compromising battery longevity. The original Garmin Lily also had a 5-day battery life, but this was without the use of pulse OX sleep tracking, a feature that the Lily 2 includes without affecting its battery performance.

On the other hand, the Garmin Vivomove Trend also provides up to 5 days of battery life in smartwatch mode, similar to the Lily 2. However, it offers an additional feature: an extended battery life of up to 1 additional week in watch mode. This extended duration is particularly beneficial for users who occasionally prefer to use their device solely as a traditional timepiece, without the smart features activated. Additionally, the Vivomove Trend introduces the convenience of wireless charging, compatible with most Qi-certified charging pads, making it the first Garmin watch with this feature.

Garmin Lily 2 vs Vivomove Trend: Technical specs

Here’s a detailed tech specs comparison table for the Garmin Lily 2 and Garmin Vivomove Trend:

Garmin Lily 2
Garmin Vivomove Trend
Release Date
January 2024
February 2023
Case Material
Anodized aluminum; Lens: Corning Gorilla Glass 3; Bezel: Anodized aluminum
Domed Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Stainless steel bezel, Fibre-reinforced polymer case, Silicone strap
Physical Buttons
35.4 x 35.4 x 10.1 mm
40.4 x 40.4 x 11.9 mm
Display Type
Liquid crystal
Liquid crystal
240 x 201 pixels
254 x 346 pixels
Screen Size
1 inch
1.01 inch
Weight (without strap)
24 grams
Case only: 28.3 g; With silicone strap: 43.3 g
Accelerometer, Gen 4 Elevate heart rate, SpO2, Ambient light sensor
Gen 3 Elevate heart rate, Barometric altimeter, Accelerometer, NFC, Ambient light sensor
Connected GPS
Connected GPS
Built-in Speaker
Music Storage
Bluetooth Smart
Bluetooth Smart and ANT+
Cellular Connectivity
Battery Type
Battery Life
Up to 5 days
Smartwatch mode: Up to 5 days; Watch mode: Up to 1 additional week
Operating System
Sport Edition (Silico Crema Oro / Coco, Lila), Classic Edition (Nylon – Brown, Gray), Classic Edition (Leather – Beige/Gold, Black/Blue)
Black, French Grey, Ivory, Mist, Grey
Typical RRP
$250 and up

Garmin Lily 2 vs Vivomove Trend: Features

The Garmin Lily 2, with its upgraded Gen 4 Elevate heart rate sensor, offers enhanced accuracy in health tracking. This model focuses on delivering essential fitness metrics, including heart rate monitoring, SpO2 (blood oxygen) levels, and stress tracking, catering to users who prioritize fundamental health insights. The Lily 2 also includes new fitness modes, such as HIIT and Dance Fitness, reflecting an expansion in its fitness tracking repertoire. However, it relies on connected GPS for location tracking, which might be a consideration for users who prefer independent GPS functionality for their outdoor activities.

In contrast, the Garmin Vivomove Trend, while sharing some sensor technology like the heart rate monitor and SpO2 tracking, steps up with the inclusion of a barometric altimeter. This addition allows for elevation tracking, beneficial for activities like hiking and stair climbing. The Vivomove Trend also supports Garmin’s advanced sleep tracking and stress monitoring, providing a well-rounded health monitoring experience.

Like the Lily 2, the Vivomove Trend utilizes connected GPS, requiring a paired smartphone for accurate location tracking during outdoor exercises. Plus it has the, above mentioned, ANT+ connection ability. In addition to connecting to heart rate straps, it can use this connection to broadcast heart rate to paired devices.

Smartwatch-type Features

In terms of smartwatch capabilities, both the Garmin Lily 2 and Vivomove Trend offer functionalities that enhance everyday convenience. They display notifications for messages and calls, provide calendar and weather information, and include music control functionalities. A significant upgrade in the Lily 2 is the inclusion of NFC for contactless payments via Garmin Pay, a feature that aligns it with contemporary smartwatch standards. The Vivomove Trend also includes NFC for Garmin Pay, ensuring users can enjoy the convenience of contactless transactions.

Both models lack onboard music storage, indicating a focus on essential smartwatch functionalities over multimedia features. The emergency help function, which transmits the wearer’s location to predefined contacts, is a thoughtful addition in both models, although it requires a connected smartphone to function.

Vivomove Trend | Image source: Garmin

Garmin Lily 2 vs Vivomove Trend: Price

Regarding pricing, the Garmin Lily 2 and Vivomove Trend are positioned in a similar price range, reflecting their advanced features and build quality. The Garmin Lily 2 is priced starting at $250, offering a balance of style, health tracking, and smartwatch functionalities. The Vivomove Trend, on the other hand, is slightly higher, starting at around $300. This price difference can probably be attributed to the Vivomove Trend’s more advanced display technology.

Garmin Lily 2 vs Vivomove Trend: Final thoughts

In a side-by-side comparison of the Garmin Lily 2 and the Garmin Vivomove Trend, it’s evident that both smartwatches cater to a market seeking a blend of style, functionality, and health tracking, albeit with nuanced differences that cater to specific user preferences. While both watches share similarities in their round shape, water resistance, and basic smartwatch functionalities, they diverge in their approach to display technology and specific health tracking features.

The Garmin Lily 2, launched in stands out with its sophisticated design, upgraded Gen 4 Elevate heart rate sensor, and new fitness modes, making it a compelling choice for those who value a combination of fashion and fitness tracking. It offers a balance of essential smartwatch features and health insights, packaged in an aesthetically pleasing design.

The larger in case size Vivomove Trend slightly edges out with its barometric altimeter, ANT+ connectivity, and the convenience of wireless charging. However it has a slightly higher price point.

View on Garmin; View on Amazon (Vivomove Trend, Lily 2).

You may also be interested in:

Garmin Lily 2 vs Lily
Polar Vantage V3 vs Garmin Venu 3
Garmin Venu 3 vs Amazfit Balance
Garmin Vivoactive 5. vs Amazfit Balance
Google Pixel Watch 2 vs Garmin Venu 3

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out!

Marko Maslakovic

Marko founded Gadgets & Wearables in 2014, having worked for more than 15 years in the City of London’s financial district. Since then, he has led the company’s charge to become a leading information source on health and fitness gadgets and wearables.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.