Image source: Fitbit

Fitbit preparing a slew of new products for 2018

Its no secret Fitbit is working on its first smartwatch. Although the production process is facing a number of hurdles, the San Francisco outfit has reassured us the device is on schedule to launch this Fall.

Essential reading: Choosing the right Fitbit tracker

Images of the yet unnamed watch have emerged earlier this year. All in all, it comes across as a typical Fitbit wearable, perhaps not too different in looks from the Blaze fitness tracker. With so many other smartwatches available, the device will hit some stiff competition when it launches.

In addition to its own app store, if all goes well the watch is likely to house a high-res colour display, built-in GPS, water-resistance, heart-rate monitoring, NFC contactless payments, on-board storage for music (including music streaming from Pandora), and four days of battery life. All this will be encased in an aluminium unibody design, with swappable bands.

But the company hasn’t tied all its fortunes to the watch and is working on a number of other devices. Unfortunately we will need to wait for 2018 to see them hit the shelves. According to Bloomberg sources, this includes the Charge 3, Blaze 2 and a new version of its popular Aria scale.

The originial Charge and Charge HR came out in October 2014, while the Charge 2 was released two years later. A 2018 release date would fit with this two-year product release cycle. Sources say that Charge 3 will be a “sleeker version” of its predecessor but apart from the design tweaks, little else has been disclosed. We would be surprised if Fitbit does not make the tracker water-resistant as its been a long time coming. So far, the Flex 2 is Fitbit’s only wearable you can take swimming with you.

Stress monitoring also seems to be one of the next frontiers. Fitbit has introduced Breathing Exercises last year but taking cue from the Garmin Vivosmart 3, we would suspect it might tap into heart-rate variability data to offer 24/7 stress tracking.

Essential reading: Top fitness trackers and health gadgets for 2017

Fitbit Blaze is just over a year old now so an update in 2018 would, again, fall into the two-year product cycle. The device focused on fitness first, smartwatch features second and this will probably remain to be the case.

The current version has connected GPS, meaning it can track movements by using the connected smartphone’s GPS. Considering that Fitbit choses to make evolutionary rather than revolutionary changes, built-in GPS in addition to waterproofing and perhaps some more sophisticated running metrics seem likely candidates for an upgrade.

Finally there is the Aria scale. Long overdue for an update, it was released back in April 2012. At the time, it was one of only a handful of connected scales on the market. This is, however, no longer the case and many companies are on their second or even third generation smart scales.

The Aria measures weight, body mass index and percentage of body fat and can keep track of up to eight individual users. Many scales now offer info on bone mass, muscle mass and water per cent. Some will even give you your local weather forecast, read your heart rate and in the case of the Nokia Body Cardio scale, your pulse wave velocity.

But for now, Fitbit seems fully focused on getting its first smartwatch out. So while we might be in for a quiet second half of the year, expect to see a slew of new products in 2018.

Like this article? Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss out.

Dusan Johnson

Dusan is our dedicated sports editor which means he gets to indulge his two passions: writing and gadgets. He never leaves his house without a minimum of two wearable devices to monitor his every move.

3 thoughts on “Fitbit preparing a slew of new products for 2018

  • It would be good if they sorted out the strap problem (they seem to bubble up on many fitbits)

    They also don’t cover all the keep fit activities, the worst thing is all you have to do is wave your arm and that registers as exercise, but it doesn’t register rowing, either on a machine or on water

    I have had mine for 2 years now, I just use it when running/walking and even so its not that accurate

    Just get things right before you release anything else, get them out for testing with the public, not in a lab somewhere

    Just get it right before you release these things, then we wont need to buy the next improved version

    • So there are a couple of things to be addressed here:
      First, I do think that Fitbit, like many other companies, test out their products to meet all required quality standards: they offer you a warranty for a year, and, should the product fail on you (depending on the case) they actually replace it without hesitation. I do believe that they have normal/average people or users test them out, it’s what’s called field testing I believe.
      Then there’s something about the bands. Yes, they do have an issue with the bands: they bubble, they peel, the tear apart, etc. But that’s something that you need to be conscious about. If you take good care of it, clean it the way they tell you to, it’ll be fine. I have owned a Fitbit Charge, a Charge HR, a Charge 2, a Flex 2, and a Blaze. The major concern was with the Charge and Charge HR since they did not have replaceable bands, which they have improved with the Charge 2. Now, there are things that I have notice that do tend to have impact on my trackers: exposure to heat, like when I’m cooking, or exposure to moisture when I’m gardening. I did call their customer support and they kindly replaced my Charge back then because eventhough I thought that it could take stirring some pans or plowing the dirt and sticking my hands into gloves that got wet gradually, they did point out that it could do some harm, and I think they’re right if you take into consideration that it’s designed to track your fitness activities and, since it is an electronic device continuous exposure to “normal” or “daily” activities may be the issue. It is not intended to be used as a “watch”.
      Now, regarding the accuracy of the device: the software or the algorithms seem to be on point in my case, but that’s only because I have taken the time to explore it’s settings and readjusted my stride length, both for walking and running, and ever since it seems to be at least 95% accurate, which is basically outstanding given the fact that it’s a wrist-based tracker and not a hip or waist based one. I can imagine why it won’t track your rowing eventhough it is a very common exercise, but depending on the tracker that you own that’s how much information you’ll get; you can’t expect the same information from a Charge than from a Blaze. The newest models do have some preset exercises that you can choose from so as for your Fitbit to track it in real time, for example: if you’re going for a run, even without the connected GPS feature, it’ll give you your current HR, the amount of steps, your calories, and all the basic info, along with the pacing (for Blaze and Charge 2 at least), and I find this pretty neat and reliable since I know for a fact that my steps will be translated into distance and then into pacing.
      I’m a fitness trainer, and the only two things that are sometimes a little bit off are the HR (which can go +/- 5 or 10 beats per minute), and the calories burnt (which I believe Fitbit overestimates). But it’s sort of ok in a sense that it’s expected to be that way, a wrist-based HR monitor is not going to be as accurate as a chest strap, let’s not talk about a medical monitor. It’s supposed to give you an idea, or an estimate.
      You need to understand that, as far as accuracy is concerned, you have to know what device suits your needs: if you’re a walker and a runner, then use a a hip or waist based tracker so as for it to track your leg movement, but if you’re more into things like elliptical, stationary, maybe orange theory or some other bootcamp or high intensity interval training, you might want to try a wrist-based tracker to monitor your torso movement.
      Last but not least, everything gets a new and improved version, it’s called innovation. I’m not a real tech-savvy person, but I can imagine why they can’t just add things to older models: it’s like when Apple decides to deprecate support for your old Apple TV or for your 2nd gen iPod Touch, if you know what I mean. If the hardware doesn’t support the change, the you can’t force a software change.

      I believe that if some people are willing to spend $700 for an iPhone or a Samsung phone each year, or every six months, a $150 fitness tracker is no biggie if you are to wear it for what it’s meant to be worn, plus, if you take good care of it, not only with cleaning it but with charging it, then it’ll outlast the warranty.
      My advise to you would be not to expect much by knowing too few.

  • Fitbit needs to fix the wrist band problem. We need xl and 2x sizes or better yet make a long band and let us cut it down to size. This would cost nothing. I do not understand how you can just forget about a large section of customers. We all do not have small wrists and furthermore if you really think about it, you are promoting a product aimed at getting larger people to loose weight. But how can we buy your product if we can not wear it?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.